Kelly: Why the criminal justice system is a massive failure


Contrary to logic, intuition and common sense, the hard fact is that punishment does not reduce criminal offending.

This may be a difficult one for some to swallow, especially since the past 45 years and more than $1 trillion have been spent on punishment as the centerpiece of American criminal justice policy. We essentially bet the farm on punishing more and more criminal offenders more and more severely. Unfortunately, we lost the farm.

We missed one very important observation. The simple fact is that while punishment works for the most part on those of us who are law-abiding, criminal offenders are not us. They lack many of the opportunities, alternatives and options we have. Punishment doesn’t change many of the problems, deficits and impairments that characterize the offender population.

A number of factors came into play to keep punishment as the primary tool of criminal justice. Front and center are the political benefits of keeping the train headed in the same direction and gaining momentum. Politicians routinely claimed it worked, often accompanied by the rallying cries of, “Lock them up and throw away the key,” and, “Do the crime, do the time.”

But there is overwhelming evidence of just how big of a policy failure it actually is. We have the largest prison population in the world, and the vast majority of criminal offenders — well north of 60 percent — reoffend within three years of being released from prison.

Fortunately, today we have the tools to remarkably reduce crime, recidivism, victimization and cost, if we are smart.

Criminal justice policy going forward should be based on the simple premise of accurately distinguishing between those offenders we should rightfully fear and those who just make us mad.

For those we rightfully fear — violent offenders, truly habitual offenders and those who have no interest in behavioral change — there is prison. Those are the offenders who need to be removed from society.

But for those who do not fall into the “truly fear” category, we need a different path.

The evidence is clear that the key is diversion from incarceration, accompanied by accurate screening and assessment to determine what problems need to be addressed, and providing the necessary resources to effectively change behavior. All of this needs to be done in an environment of supervision, compliance and accountability, accompanied by appropriate sanctioning for noncompliance. Sounds simple, but the devil is truly in the details.

We need to build sufficient diversion and treatment capacity, change sentencing laws to provide for much greater diversion, bring the necessary clinical expertise to the table, make judicial and prosecutorial decision-making much more collaborative and change how we think about crime and punishment. For example, drug courts are effective at reducing substance abuse and recidivism. And they are much more cost-efficient than punishment alone. However, although there are approximately 3,000 drug courts in the U.S., the capacity of these courts is sufficient to address only about 10 percent of the need.

Large percentages of criminal offenders have substance abuse problems, are mentally ill or have neurocognitive impairments and deficits. Unemployment, poor education and occasionally homelessness also plague offenders. Current policies do little to change any of these problems. Comprehensive, systematic change to the criminal justice system is required if we want to enhance public safety and reduce cost.

Every presidential candidate, Republican and Democratic, has chimed in on criminal justice reform, but none seem to grasp the big picture. The American criminal justice system is a massive failure that requires a comprehensive solution. We have an opportunity today to get smart about crime and criminal justice policy. We have an effective path forward that is based on scientific evidence. What we appear to lack is the willingness to embrace the solution with the enthusiasm and resources with which we embraced “tough on crime” 45 years ago.

Kelly is a professor of sociology and the founding director of the Center for Criminology and Criminal Justice Research at the University of Texas. His most recent book, “Criminal Justice at the Crossroads: Transforming Crime and Punishment,” was published by Columbia University Press in May.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Nov. 24, 2017

Re: Nov. 15 article, “France terrorism survivor: EMDR therapy helped me, could help others.” Though I am extremely sorry for the horrible violence Maegan Copeland’s family experienced, I was thrilled to see the front-page article on Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing. As an 18-year hospice chaplain with Hospice Austin,...
Opinion: Is America up for a second Cold War?

After the 19th national congress of the Chinese Communist Party in October, one may discern Premier Xi Jinping’s vision of the emerging New World Order. By 2049, the centennial of the triumph of Communist Revolution, China shall have become the first power on earth. Her occupation and humiliation by the West and Japan in the 19th and 20th centuries...
Texas can, should do better for state living center residents
Texas can, should do better for state living center residents

Liz Belile visits her sister Shanna in the Austin State Supported Living Center in West Austin Monday October 30, 2017. Belile’s sister suffers from a seizure disorder and needs permanent care, but having her in Austin has provided her with the opportunity to look in on her regularly and tend to her other needs....
With ‘Spineless,’ Austin author explores both her past and jellyfish
With ‘Spineless,’ Austin author explores both her past and jellyfish

Consider, if you will, the humble jellyfish. It’s a creature both 95 percent water and often possessed of one of the planet’s deadliest venoms. A creature that has existed in its current form, more or less, for millions of years, yet is one of the planet’s most delicate. In some languages, jellyfish translates as “living water&rdquo...
Commentary: Boeing ruling stretched to keep government records secret
Commentary: Boeing ruling stretched to keep government records secret

Every week, government officials across Texas and private companies receiving taxpayer dollars get increasingly creative in hiding public records. Their new tool is the Boeing ruling, a decision from the Texas Supreme Court that lowered the threshold for arguing competitive bidding as an exemption from disclosure under the Texas Public Information...
More Stories