Inglis: Ann Richards warned us; now we march to protect women’s rights


I’ll be marching in the Texas version of the Women’s March on Washington on Jan. 21. Why? Because women’s reproductive rights are being taken away, just as the late Gov. Ann Richards predicted.

On a brisk night in October 1990, many of us had gathered for a hastily called rally for gubernatorial candidate Ann Richards. She was standing on a makeshift stage in the parking lot of the American Civil Liberties Union office on Lavaca Street, across from the Capitol.

We had watched her electric speech at the 1988 Democratic National Convention, where she proclaimed “Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did. She just did it backwards in high heels,” so we were excited to see her in person. She talked about issues facing the state with clarity, charm and irreverent quick-draw quips. But when she got to women’s reproductive rights, she became deadly serious. She told us never to take them for granted — that the day would come when those rights would be under siege.

That seemed far-fetched, but I tucked the scary thought away for a day I hoped would never come. But here we are.

According to data from the Guttmacher Institute, by last year more than half the states — mostly in the South and Midwest — are deemed “hostile to abortion” based on number of restrictions.

Not to be outdone by Southern states nor deterred by last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Texas’ senseless and extreme abortion rules, Texas continues in its tireless, jihadist quest to oppress women by depriving them of abortion services.

It’s interesting how quick our leaders are to hurt poor women. Though Planned Parenthood is indisputably the provider of choice in underserved areas — and though abortions compose less than five percent of its services — state health officials moved in December to oust the agency as a Medicaid health provider in a move the agency immediately filed suit to block.

Financially, the effect on the agency would be minimal since only around five percent of its revenue comes from Medicaid. But it would cut 11,000 women from receiving any health services, including birth control and life-saving screenings. It would also devastate morale, as the people who work there are deeply motivated to help low-income women.

Planned Parenthood has been around for 100 years and is deeply trusted by health care professionals and women of all income levels. My neonatal intensive care co-workers and I have referred countless mothers to the agency.

This session, priority bills are being introduced by the lieutenant governor to prohibit third-trimester abortion, ban insurance coverage of abortion and prohibit abortion providers from donating fetal tissue for medical research. That makes about as much sense as outlawing organ donation.

Another bill would eliminate an exception that allows for third-trimester abortions for fetuses with “severe and irreversible abnormalities” that are incompatible with life outside the womb. And Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, has proposed a constitutional amendment “guaranteeing the right to life of unborn children and prohibiting abortion to the extent authorized under federal constitutional law.” I guess the senator hasn’t heard which way Roe v. Wade went.

Facts, science and reason — endangered concepts — do not support lawmakers’ assault on abortion. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the abortion rate has fallen to well below the 1973 rate when abortion was illegal and Roe v. Wade decided. So, what’s the point?

On Jan. 20, a confidence man who has bragged about assaulting women will be inaugurated as the U.S. president. The day after, tens of thousands of us will gather on the south grounds of the Capitol at noon to demonstrate that the right of women to freely decide whether and when to have children is important. As Ann Richards said, we’ve got to fight to keep our rights from being taken away. Please join us.

Inglis, a lifelong Austin resident, is a retired editor and neonatal intensive care nurse. You may reach her on her website, inglisopinion.com.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: July 28, 2017
Letters to the editor: July 28, 2017

Re: July 23 article, “Hutto City Council replaces entire development board amid criticism.” Kudos to the Hutto City Council for replacing the entire board of directors for the town’s economic development corporation after discovering the lavish spending by the corporation on hotel rooms. It has too long been customary for many of...
Collins: Wow, Trump can’t terminate
Collins: Wow, Trump can’t terminate

Pick your favorite irony: 1) Donald Trump turns out to be terrible at firing people. 2) The White House celebrates its “American Heroes Week” by banning transgender volunteers from serving in the military. 3) Thanks to the president’s harangues, we are actually starting to feel sympathy for Jeff Sessions. I can definitely understand...
Milbank: The United States of Anarchy
Milbank: The United States of Anarchy

WASHINGTON — Welcome to the United States of Anarchy. Health care legislation languishes without presidential leadership. The Senate fails to pass a measure crafted by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, fails to pass an outright repeal and even fails to pass a proposal to go back to the drawing board. Huge majorities in Congress, declining to bless...
Two Views: Smith dodges criticism behind cold comfort of a telephone
Two Views: Smith dodges criticism behind cold comfort of a telephone

A representative is elected to represent us. But how can U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith do this when he will not meet with us or listen to us? Where is Lamar Smith? He does not hold town meetings. He does not let us know when he is in Austin. We are his constituents. Yet he routinely votes against our expressed interests. Is he not interested in knowing what...
Two Views: Constituents OK with tele-town meetings, says Lamar Smith
Two Views: Constituents OK with tele-town meetings, says Lamar Smith

I am interested in the thoughts and ideas of all residents of Texas’ 21st Congressional District. I regularly meet with constituents who share or oppose my views. Fortunately, it’s more often the former! The 21st District covers 10 counties, including Travis. I make regular visits to Austin. Last year, the number of days I spent in Travis...
More Stories