Herman: Dog days in the newsroom


From time to time I like to take you behind the scenes here at the Newspaper-by-the-Lake-That’s-Really-A-River. Today is one of those days. Lucky for you.

The two questions I get most from readers are (1) Please tell me how you folks produce the magic that is the newspaper and websites we are so blessed to have, and (B) Hey, Brooklyn boy — they pay you to write this stuff?

The answers are (1) A total, selfless dedication to the betterment of our community, and (B) No, they overpay me.

Today’s topic is an announcement at a recent staff meeting. Perhaps you’re aware these are times of great change and challenge for newspapers. At this recent meeting, we were updated on various upcoming changes, including the addition of our content to the Alexa device, which will give you an exciting new way to yell at us.

RELATED: Get the American-Statesman flash briefing on Alexa

And we heard about a new program aimed at keeping newsroom folks happy. You ever try to keep newsroom folks happy? Not easy. We’ve got good benefits, river/lakefront views and a bottomless candy drawer. Yet, somehow, not everybody in the newsroom seems happy each and every moment of each and every day. Go figure.

So management (and let’s stop here for the usual reminder that everybody in management here is brilliant) has come up with a new program. Turns out in addition to being brilliant, the management folks are kind to animals. At last some animals.

Employees with dogs — and only dogs — are being invited to bring them to work. I’m aware this is a thing in some businesses. It’s a new thing at this business that started in our sales department weeks ago. And there are rules, delineated in the “Bring Your Dog to Work Newsroom Guidelines and Acknowledgement” posted for our perusal.

These are good rules. (Management never makes bad rules.) Unfortunately, they include some rules for dogs that I fear some of my colleagues (including me on some days) would have trouble living up to.

Visiting dogs must be “up to date on vaccinations, flea and heart worm treatments (and have) been neutered.” (I’ll give you a few seconds here for your own joke about whether journalists should reproduce.) Dogs also must be “friendly, clean, housebroken and generally well-mannered.” (Hey, isn’t that the motto of the Dog Scouts of America?)

The guidelines remind us “Your co-workers are here to work, not pet sit. If you have a job in which you might be called away on assignments unexpectedly, don’t bring your dog to work.” We’re also reminded to “Respect that not everyone likes dogs.”

“If your dog doesn’t like strangers, don’t bring it to work. If your dog would be miserable sitting in an office all day, don’t bring it to work. There is no tolerance for biting.”

FUN ON THE GO: Download the Austin360 app to find more things to do and share with your friends

And there’s a guideline reminding us that management, in addition to being brilliant and kind to (some) animals, has a wonderful sense of humor.

“You will be required to remove your dog from our premises based on excessive disruption to normal business operations, ex., barking, whining, too noisy, etc. That goes for the dog’s behavior, too.”

The program is limited to one dog at a time, no more than two dogs per day, no more than two days a week. That provides both challenge and opportunity for a colleague who asked me about his three dogs. I told him this could be an incentive: “Whichever of you behaves best doesn’t have to go to the newsroom.”

I assume flexibility might be shown for pooches that show writing talent, which will be judged on ruff drafts. Bird dogs will be allowed to tweet. (Oh, quit your groaning. You know how much worse this could have been?)

There’s also a “Newsroom Dog Days Feedback” form offered as a “safe space for you to offer your feedback on the bring your dog to work program.” One of the questions asks for feedback once the program’s underway, rating it on a scale of one to 10, with one being “Can’t stand it. It’s a drooly mess,” and 10 being “Love it. Best thing about the newsroom now.”

The new program seemed well-received at the meeting as visions of cute puppies danced in our heads. One guy did raise what I thought was an excellent question about equality: “Can we bring kitties?” I asked.

No, I was told. The program is species-specific. Doesn’t seem fair, does it? I think a bring-your-pet-to-work program would be far more interesting. I harbor suspicions about the odd pets some of my colleagues might have.

TAKE A BREAK AT MIDDAY: Click here for our midday email of news and entertainment

To stave off email protestations, let’s make it clear that I like dogs. The only reason I’ve never had one is because they are annoying. Just kidding there.

The real reason I’ve never had one is because they seem like more of a commitment than I’ve ever been willing to make for a pet. They look like tons of fun, and I’d love playing with them at home and enjoying the somehow socially acceptable practice of taking them to a neighbor’s yard to do the messier things they do.

My family has had cats. Having a cat is relatively low maintenance and almost like having a pet. But I don’t think of myself as a cat person, with all its potentially negative connotations, including maturing into an Older American with 13 cats including one named Miss Snickerbottoms.

I’m looking forward to meeting my colleagues’ dogs. I’ll keep you posted on any incidents and those with the silliest names (the dogs, not the colleagues).

And I’ll give you full coverage if I see any kitties picketing outside the building.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Oct. 19, 2017

Re: Oct. 16 article, “CodeNext: Is Austin doing enough to reach out to non-English speakers?” Why translate? If anyone wants to live in the U.S., let them learn the talk of the country. Last I heard, here it was still English. If I moved to Mexico, do you think that they would print everything in English? Of course not. When my ancestors...
Commentary: Let’s build global consensus for reconnecting with nature
Commentary: Let’s build global consensus for reconnecting with nature

During the past few weeks, millions of people around the Gulf of Mexico have experienced the fury of Mother Nature. Four massive hurricanes and two earthquakes have devastated numerous communities. It is humbling to realize that despite enormous technical advancements, we are still as much at the mercy of nature’s wrath as the Teotihuacanos in...
Commentary: Why Hartnett White is dangerous for environmental council
Commentary: Why Hartnett White is dangerous for environmental council

With each new appointee to the Trump administration, it’s like the president is trolling us. Put someone who sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 14 times in charge of the agency? Check. Appoint a man who wanted to eliminate the Department of Energy as its head? Check. But you ain’t seen nothing yet. Trump’s newest choice...
Opinion: Trump’s scary strategy on North Korea

On just the first day of a war between the United States and North Korea, according to a Stanford University assessment, 1 million people could be killed. Yet after my five-day visit to North Korea with three New York Times colleagues, such a nuclear war seems terrifyingly imaginable. In the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, it was clear that President...
Trump’s appeal to evangelicals is timely and welcomed

President Trump addressed this year’s annual Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C. He is the first sitting U.S. president to do so. The Values Voters Summit is hosted by the Family Research Council, an organization whose mission is addressing public policy and culture from a Christian point of view. Its base is largely evangelical Christians...
More Stories