You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Get ready Austin for a strong legislative thumping over local policies


Austin needs to dramatically sharpen its offense and defense in dealing with the Texas Legislature when it convenes this week to protect many hard-won accomplishments championed by local voters and their representatives. Those include Austin’s regulations on short-term rental properties, requirements for ride-hailing companies to fingerprint their drivers, and, of course, Austin Energy’s regulatory authority and market share.

That there will be an attack on those issues is a given considering the leadership in control of the Texas Senate — led by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick – that has made clear its intent to force local governments to conform to its conservative agenda. The best hope in stopping anti-local control measures rests with the House, led by GOP House Speaker Joe Straus, whose members are elected from smaller districts than state senators and therefore tend to be more attuned to local voters.

Local control, once a pinnacle of conservative ideology, is out the window, replaced with big-government measures that aim to usurp the will and authority of smaller governments that are closer to the communities they serve. A good example of that is a state-proposed measure Patrick is pushing that would dictate which bathroom a transgender person would use — a decision that should be left to local governments and private companies.

This session, bills are expected to move out of the Senate much faster than in previous sessions so they are less susceptible to parliamentary procedures in the House that can and do kill bills. Austin had better be ready for that.

“Half the Senate will be wearing cervical collars because of the whiplash of watching how fast (bills prioritized by Patrick) fly out of the Senate,” said state Sen. Kirk Watson, D-Austin.

Among those is Senate Bill 2. The bill by state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, would limit how much city and county property tax rates could increase without voter approval. That threshold would be set at 4 percent compared to the 8 percent currently in place. Also, Bettencourt’s bill would automatically trigger elections in which voters could nix planned tax rate increases of 4 percent or greater compared with current law in which voters must petition to hold such an election.

Certainly, we’ve criticized the city of Austin and Travis County for going to the maximum tax rate in some years instead of holding the line on budgets. But the biggest offenders in our skyrocketing property tax system are not in city halls or county seats. They are in state government.

Property taxes levied by school districts are by far the single-largest and most burdensome Texans are hit with annually. That’s because the state continues to push much of its responsibility in financing schools onto local voters. The Legislature could deliver true property tax relief by increasing its share of school funding instead of deflecting or engaging in woefully inadequate measures such as Senate Bill 2. Texans need real tax relief, not smoke and mirrors.

At least Austin won’t be alone in fighting off Senate Bill 2 or pushing for the state to increase school funding and fix its Robin Hood scheme so Austin and other Central Texas districts can keep more of their local revenue. Other large cities and school districts will join those fights.

But Austin might find itself alone in facing some daggers reserved for the city.

That dilemma is largely the result of a provocative declaration by newly elected Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez, a Democrat, who while on the campaign trail said she would not hold convicted felons or other inmates in the Travis County jail when the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency sent detainers for them.

Such action would make Austin the state’s first so-called sanctuary city, as the Texas Tribune reported in August following an interview with Hernandez, who took office last week.

In a GOP-dominated state, that was akin to poking a growling bear. And while Hernandez has since tried to soften her position on the matter by saying she would review current jail policies and hold discussions with others before making decisions regarding ICE, the damage is done. The bear now is in full charge.

Republican state Rep. Paul Workman of Austin has filed a bill outlawing sanctuary cities in Texas, echoing similar legislation in the Senate as well as Patrick’s pledge to prioritize a legislative ban against sanctuary cities.

But the fallout to Austin extends beyond a ban.

Hernandez’s statement to end cooperation with ICE is seen by Republicans from Gov. Greg Abbott on down as an attack on GOP orthodoxy. As such they are looking for ways to chasten Austin. Privately, some Democrats have expressed their displeasure with what they consider unnecessary needling by Hernandez.

Indeed, while willy-nilly deportation creates bad humanitarian and financial policy, what Hernandez has suggested would shield all county inmates — including dangerous felons — from ICE. As of the end of October, most of the county jail ICE detainers were for immigrant inmates facing felony charges — a huge shift from past years when the vast majority were for inmates facing misdemeanor charges. The federal policy now in place prioritizes felons for ICE detainers so as to prevent deportation of minor offenders.

And that protection from federal scrutiny offered at the county jail would come at a cost. The American-Statesman reported that Travis County could lose millions of dollars in state and federal grants if it ended all cooperation with ICE — another reason Hernandez should clarify her statement. Those costs likely would be passed along to taxpayers.

With Austin-bashing in full swing, local officials must make an effective case for keeping certain things intact, such as the city’s plastic bag ban, protections for Austin Energy and its ordinance phasing out Type 2 short-term rentals, which essentially operate as year-round commercial businesses in residential neighborhoods.

That case is best made by showcasing Austin’s and Travis County’s continued economic success and contributions to the state’s growth and prosperity. But for goodness sake, stop poking the bear.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Michael A. Lindenberger: Boycotting inauguration is disrespectful
Michael A. Lindenberger: Boycotting inauguration is disrespectful

Lindenberger is a columnist for The Dallas Morning News.Lindenberger is a columnist for The Dallas Morning News. Liberal lawmakers and others who find the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency untenable are busy making plans to be anywhere but Washington come Friday, when Chief Justice John Roberts asks one of the biggest purveyors of falsehoods in...
Jay Ambrose: Making U.S. great again is not impossible
Jay Ambrose: Making U.S. great again is not impossible

Ambrose is an op-ed columnist for Tribune News Service. It is here, it is upon us, it is the utterly, totally, completely impossible presidency of Donald Trump, and he has opportunities galore to rejuvenate the best in this country. Some of his ideas could get us there as he is also reversing the worst of President Barack Obama. Will it happen? Will...
Jack Hunter: Could Obama be the “change” candidate Obama wasn’t?
Jack Hunter: Could Obama be the “change” candidate Obama wasn’t?

Hunter is politics editor for Rare.us. Columnist William Greider wrote three months into Barack Obama’s presidency in 2009 after the bank bailouts, “During the past nine months, gigantic financial bailouts amid collapsing economic life made visible the crippling divide between governing elites and citizens at large.” “People...
When Backpage.com peddles schoolgirls for sex

As a 16-year-old high school sophomore living in Boston, Asia Graves was sold on the internet “like a pizza,” she recalls, handed over to be raped by strange men every day. Along with thousands of other girls, she was sold through what amounts to an online brothel called Backpage. It dominates the online sex trade and is implicated in almost...
Inglis: Ann Richards warned us; now we march to protect women’s rights
Inglis: Ann Richards warned us; now we march to protect women’s rights

Inglis, a lifelong Austin resident, is a retired editor and neonatal intensive care nurse. You may reach her on her website, inglisopinion.com. I’ll be marching in the Texas version of the Women’s March on Washington on Jan. 21. Why? Because women’s reproductive rights are being taken away, just as the late Gov. Ann Richards predicted...
More Stories