Congress can no longer ignore digital security


Privacy versus security. How to balance the two is an age-old, enduring debate, though when we say “privacy” these days, often what we are talking about is our personal digital security.

“It’s not privacy versus security. It’s really security versus security,” is how Republican U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul of Austin phrased it during a meeting with the editorial board on Wednesday.

However it’s framed, Congress has been reluctant to try to find a digital balance between individual and business security and national security. We support a proposal by McCaul aimed at moving Congress beyond its reluctance.

McCaul, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, and Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia have called on their colleagues in Congress to establish a commission to study digital security issues. McCaul and Warner hope the commission’s recommendations guide Congress toward consensus and action that will allow the federal government to protect Americans against terrorist attacks without exposing consumers and technology companies to hackers and government intrusion.

If created as McCaul and Warner propose, the National Commission on Security and Technology Challenges will have 16 members, with eight members appointed by the Republican leaders of the House and Senate and eight members appointed by the chambers’ Democratic leaders. Their proposal allows for the president to appoint one nonvoting member to the commission.

The proposal requires that commissioners be selected for their expertise in technology, law enforcement, national security, and civil liberties and privacy. Once assembled, the commission would have six months to send Congress an interim report and 12 months to produce a final report — a tight time frame driven by what McCaul called a rapidly changing “terrorist landscape” and “terrorism gone viral.”

McCaul said his concern is how to stop a Paris-style attack from happening in the United States. The attackers who killed 130 people in Paris in November were part of a new generation of technologically sophisticated terrorists who use encrypted messaging applications to create a “dark space” where they can communicate and plot without being detected by national security and law enforcement officials.

“If you can’t see what they’re saying, then it’s hard to stop a terrorist plot,” McCaul said.

McCaul and Warner began working on their commission proposal a year ago, but it arrives as a legal battle between Apple and the federal government has taken over the national conversation about digital security. The FBI wants Apple to help it access the data on an iPhone used by Syed Farook, who, with his wife, Tashfeen Malik, killed 14 people in San Bernadino, Calif., in December. The iPhone’s encrypted security features protect user’s information by destroying it when someone attempts to guess the user’s pass code. Too many wrong guesses and the data is wiped. The problem for Apple is that to unlock Farook’s phone for the FBI, it would have to construct a “backdoor” into its operating system. Such a backdoor potentially could make all iPhones vulnerable to hackers, criminals and governments.

The Justice Department has accused Apple of creating a “warrant-proof” phone. Apple worries the government wants it to engineer a warrant-less phone. Last month, a federal judge in California ordered Apple to help the FBI. Apple refused. Each side is scheduled to makes its case in federal court on March 22.

McCaul called this “war of the courts” between Apple and the FBI unfortunate and counterproductive. As a former U.S. attorney, he said he gets the FBI’s point of view: The agency obtained a court order; Apple should comply. At the same time, McCaul said he understands Apple’s perspective and appreciates the company’s concerns about the potential exploitation of any crack in its encryption features.

McCaul sees the Apple case as primarily an “evidentiary” issue. He worries about stopping future terrorist attacks. He hopes a commission on digital security can facilitate “a national dialogue to provide solutions to the Congress” so it can respond to a complex problem thoughtfully and carefully. The alternative is to risk a broad, knee-jerk response with unintended consequences.

It is in Congress, not the courts, where this issue should be resolved. Encryption is essential for protecting consumers, commerce, businesses and the nation’s infrastructure, but it is challenging for national security and law enforcement. Too many members of Congress have chosen to hope that the need to balance personal security and national security somehow magically goes away, or that the courts will settle the issue. But such a resolution in the courts will take years — and there will be conflicting rulings along the way that only will add to the confusion.

Consider that the law governing the Apple case, the All Writs Act, was passed in 1789. Though the law has been modified several times in the 227 years since, the legal authority governing the Apple case nonetheless remains rooted in an act passed by the very first Congress of the United States and signed into law by President George Washington.

It’s time to move from the era of the quill pen into the digital age.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Herman: Free speech, our president and our favorite Sunday pastime
Herman: Free speech, our president and our favorite Sunday pastime

As long as we’re having this important free-speech conversation, and hoping this conversation leads to the important race-relations conversation, let’s make sure it’s properly framed: It most definitely is about freedom of speech, but maybe not in the way some people think. President Donald Trump, having successfully solved all of...
Commentary: Trump isn’t urging patriotism; he’s provoking a culture war
Commentary: Trump isn’t urging patriotism; he’s provoking a culture war

Once again, President Donald Trump has inserted himself into the latest iteration of the culture wars with his recent comments targeting Golden State Warriors star Stephen Curry and the National Football League. Whether it’s criticizing the removal of Confederate statues or equating anti-fascist protesters with white supremacists, make no mistake...
Letters to the editor: Sept. 26, 2017

Re: Sept. 21 article, “Kitchen calls to name Robert E. Lee Road for only black U.S. treasurer.” As a resident of the Zilker neighborhood, I applaud Austin City Council Member Ann Kitchen’s proposal to rename Robert E. Lee Road for Azie Taylor Morton, who by all accounts was a patriotic and honorable local resident. Lee, most assuredly...
Commentary: Dell Medical School delivers on promise of healthier city
Commentary: Dell Medical School delivers on promise of healthier city

Five years ago, Travis County voters did something powerful: They created a medical school funded by local property tax dollars with an unprecedented focus on the community — especially those who’ve suffered from health inequities. The Dell Medical School at the University of Texas is still a startup. I arrived as dean in 2014; last summer...
Viewpionts: Young would-be voters should learn value of their ballots
Viewpionts: Young would-be voters should learn value of their ballots

When the time comes to teach kids about voting, Austin High School government teachers Rolando Duarte and Stephanie Harris provide students with a robust, engaging lesson plan that includes voter registration drives, schoolwide mock elections and daily conversations about current events and hot-button issues. Their approach, studies suggest, help build...
More Stories