Commentary: What if Sutherland Springs had no ‘good guy with a gun’?

The fact that a bystander armed with his own rifle chased and shot the perpetrator in Sutherland Springs crucially transforms the terrain of the political interpretation of the shootings.

The presence of an armed citizen “shooting in the opposite direction,” as President Donald Trump put it in the hours after the killings, activates partisan attitudes about guns in Texas that advocates and political leaders can use to stifle discussion of adding even the mildest restrictions to guns. That’s because the thought that the best antidote to gun violence is good people with guns resonates sufficiently with the right audience of Republicans.

RELATED: How Austin ‘good guy with gun’ case highlights gun control debate

Broadly speaking, this “good guy with a gun” approach to prevent mass shootings comes from hybrid roots that include diffused-but-questionable readings of history projected onto the present by political leaders, decisively debunked social science research, and, of course, a nontrivial but also nonrepresentative set of anecdotes. The essence of the proposition is simple: The best thing for stopping a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.

Faith in the efficacy of packing self-protection is evident in the attitudes of Texas Republicans. In a University of Texas/Texas Tribune Poll last month, we asked Texas voters this question: “If more people carried guns, do you think the United States would be safer, less safe, or would it have no impact on safety?”

Overall, 38 percent of Texas voters polled said the U.S. would be safer; 41 percent said it would be less safe. Beneath this close division in attitudes, there are sharp partisan differences: 66 percent of Republicans said it would make us safer, and 75 percent of Democrats said it would make us less safe. Among tea party identifiers, who have helped drive the loosening of gun restrictions, including the push in the Texas Legislature in 2015 to allow open carry, 85 percent said it would make the U.S. safer.

The fact that an armed bystander engaged the Sutherland Springs perpetrator leads one to expect this line of response to supplement, if not entirely supplant, the habitual recourse to mental health in long-term responses to the latest episode.

CONTINUING COVERAGE: Sutherland Springs sanctuary reopens as solemn memorial.

In strictly pragmatic terms, the frequent emphasis on mental health has obvious political benefits for opponents of any legislation on gun access or ownership: It fits into people’s — and especially Republicans’ — preconceptions about the causes of mass shootings. At the same time, it remains faithful to the fact that GOP voters are generally opposed to stricter gun control laws — especially when mobilized.

Ironically, this incident highlights the potential limits of Republican elected officials’ usual reliance on invoking mental health policy as an alternative to modifying gun laws to deflect action until public interest and attention drifts to another subject. It doesn’t take long at all.

In our October poll, conducted less than a week after the concert shooting in Las Vegas, only 6 percent of Texans thought gun violence was the most important problem facing the country. Nonetheless, the frequency and visibility of mass shootings could eventually contribute to calls for solutions that might involve more thorough screening of gun purchases — something anathema to Second Amendment proponents.

Herein lies the political value in the current moment of the good guy with a gun narrative: It transforms the problem into its solution, even as it reduces the chances of backsliding into politically distasteful discussion of regulating gun ownership.

Any discussion of curtailing gun rights can be swiftly met with a simple retort: How much worse would this have been if there hadn’t been a good guy with a gun? So, while this tragedy may lead some Texas Democrats and liberals to think that the mass murder in Sutherland Springs might tilt the state’s conversation on gun control and gun ownership, the opposite is more likely.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

Moving forward, we should expect the presence of an armed civilian returning fire and its narrative of a good guy with a gun to drown out discussion of even relatively minor adjustments to gun ownership practices — even those that might fit within the usually reliable mental health narrative.

Henson is the director of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas. Blank is manager of polling and research of the project.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Nov. 23, 2017

There is a well-worn real estate mantra: “location, location, location.” But poor design can ruin a great location. The city of Austin and the University of Texas have overlooked the need for a level of architectural control for years. UT is completing such a master stroke at Guadalupe Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard with the...
Opinion: Billionaires desperately need our help

It is so hard to be a billionaire these days! A new yacht can cost $300 million. And you wouldn’t believe what a pastry chef earns — and if you hire just one, to work weekdays, how can you possibly survive on weekends? The investment income on, say, a $4 billion fortune is a mere $1 million a day, which makes it tough to scrounge by with...
Herman: The George H.W. Bush dilemma
Herman: The George H.W. Bush dilemma

Sadly, there’s much to be sad about as we’re fixin′ to fix the fixings and preparing to check off what we have to be thankful for as we celebrate Thanksgiving 2017. On a micro basis, most of us have much good stuff for which to be thankful. On the mega basis, as always, there’s good for which to be thankful and bad for which...
Commentary: How young voters can bring truth back to politics
Commentary: How young voters can bring truth back to politics

The way we pass laws in this state is failing young Texans. Elected officials use lies to pass bad laws. Turning lies into laws hurts our state and risks alienating a rising generation of Texans when we should be doing everything possible to encourage their participation in the political process. That politicians ignore or distort facts for the sake...
Commentary: Why the spirit of Thanksgiving resonates with Muslims
Commentary: Why the spirit of Thanksgiving resonates with Muslims

Thanksgiving — with all its festivities and scrumptious dishes — has always been my favorite holiday. As an immigrant to America, I adore this holiday not only for its origin of fostering peace but as well for focusing on divine remembrance and for offering gratitude — a common value shared by all religions. As a Muslim, the idea...
More Stories