Commentary: What to expect from Trump’s ‘rolling coal’ plan

The Department of Energy and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) are currently debating a rule designed, in part, to subsidize coal-fired power plants that have struggled to compete with less expensive gas-fired, wind and solar generators in electricity markets.

The Trump administration says the subsidies are necessary to ensure system reliability. They are not.

Instead, this proposal is a symbolic political gesture, only understandable as a sop to coal companies and a swipe at environmentalists and the Obama administration.

Which is not to suggest we shouldn’t worry about the reliability of the electric system. There are legitimate questions to be asked about how competitive markets will ensure a reliable electric supply since, unlike traditional public utility regulation, competitive markets do not offer power plant owners predictable streams of revenue that make them want to build a plant in the first place. Plus, as intermittent resources such as wind and solar command a larger share of the generation mix, the system will undoubtedly need more reliable backup supplies.

INSIGHT: Why Rick Perry’s subsidies plan for coal fails Economics 101.

That said, grid operators understand this risk and are managing it well all over the country. From California to Texas to Minnesota, they have been able to integrate much larger amounts of renewable power into the grid than anyone thought possible, without jeopardizing reliability. And they are planning for the future too — albeit differently in different places.

In some parts of the country market managers hold auctions for the excess capacity they might need in an emergency. Some regions encourage demand-side measures, rewarding customers who conserve, or who are willing to shift their electricity consumption from peak to off-peak periods. Others are encouraging “behind the meter” (customer-owned) generation such as rooftop solar panels, while still others are installing batteries and other forms of electricity storage to improve system reliability. And, some states are subsidizing old nuclear power stations to ensure they don’t leave the system.

Why subsidize nuclear and not coal? Because nuclear does not kill tens of thousands of Americans prematurely each year. Coal does.

Coal companies and their patrons in the Trump administration suggest coal-fired power plants are more reliable because they maintain a fuel supply on site, while natural-gas-fired power plants obtain their fuel in real time through the pipeline system. But this too is a red herring: Shipments of coal by rail are as interruptible as shipments of natural gas by pipeline. For example, Hurricane Harvey forced one Texas coal plant to switch to gas when its coal pile became saturated and unusable.

The truth is that we do not need coal-fired power to ensure system reliability, a reality that is widely accepted by experts across the political spectrum. The grid of the future will value flexibility — the ability to react quickly to sudden changes in demand or supply. Coal-fired power plants can’t do that.

Batteries, natural-gas-fired generation, pumped-storage hydroelectric power and demand response are nimble and flexible. And, by the way, a lot cleaner than coal. Those sources are all going to be far more valuable in the future than old coal-fired power plants, as virtually every grid operator in the country knows.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

Secretary of Energy Rick Perry understands this too. He was the governor when Texas developed the country’s most competitive electricity market, one in which regulators do less to subsidize reliable generators than any other market.

So why would federal regulators now want to force customers to forgo cheaper sources of electricity from natural gas and the sun and the wind in favor of dirtier, deadlier coal-fired power? From a policy perspective, this proposal makes very little sense. It makes much more sense as an expression of opposition to the left.

If you want to understand this proposal, start by searching online for the phrase “rolling coal.” You’ll see that this rule is nothing more than a pointless, cathartic gesture, merely a way for the administration to act out the elite equivalent of rolling coal. If enacted, this rule would not only waste time and money, it would needlessly pollute the air and prematurely kill thousands of Americans in the process.

Spence is a professor of energy law and regulation at the University of Texas.

Spence is a professor of energy law and regulation at the University of Texas.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Trump’s scary strategy on North Korea

On just the first day of a war between the United States and North Korea, according to a Stanford University assessment, 1 million people could be killed. Yet after my five-day visit to North Korea with three New York Times colleagues, such a nuclear war seems terrifyingly imaginable. In the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, it was clear that President...
Trump’s appeal to evangelicals is timely and welcomed

President Trump addressed this year’s annual Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C. He is the first sitting U.S. president to do so. The Values Voters Summit is hosted by the Family Research Council, an organization whose mission is addressing public policy and culture from a Christian point of view. Its base is largely evangelical Christians...
INSIGHT: With ride-hailing apps, should Americans stop owning cars?
INSIGHT: With ride-hailing apps, should Americans stop owning cars?

Every day, there’s more news about the inevitable arrival of autonomous vehicles. At the same time, more people are using ride-hailing and ride-sharing apps — and the percentage of teens getting their driver’s license continues to decline. Given these technologies and social changes, it’s worth asking: Should Americans stop...
Commentary: How social media posts can hurt criminal investigations
Commentary: How social media posts can hurt criminal investigations

Law enforcement officials are facing a new set of challenges in the age of social media. One such challenge is becoming more common — and I feel compelled to call attention to it. The act of capturing video or photographs of crime scenes and posting those images to social media is harmful to law enforcement investigative efforts. This year, we&rsquo...
Commentary: What the U.S. will lose after its withdrawal from UNESCO
Commentary: What the U.S. will lose after its withdrawal from UNESCO

“Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed.” So begins the preamble to the Constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. They were words written in 1945 by the American poet and playwright Archibald MacLeish, who served on the organization&rsquo...
More Stories