Commentary: Texas teachers are once again under attack


Once again teachers are under attack.

Every two years, men and women elected by the voters of their districts arrive under the pink dome of the Texas Capitol to draft laws for the betterment of our state and the folks back home. Yet predictably as sunrise, some are co-opted by deep-pocketed special interests to serve lesser ends.

The results are crooked works of legislative effrontery that hurt Texans and soil the dignity of the Texas Legislature. Two bills filed this session to limit the way educators support professional organizations are among the worst examples. Senate Bill 13 by Sen. Joan Huffman (R-Houston) and House Bill 510 by Rep. Sarah Davis (R-West University Place) are being sold as anti-union bills, but make no mistake: They are malicious instruments aimed squarely at teachers.

Designated a priority item by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and touted by Gov. Greg Abbott in his State of the State Address, this legislation claims to get the state out of the business of “collecting union dues” by banning the ability of select public employees to deduct voluntary membership fees from their paychecks. In actuality, it singles out educators — many of whom do not belong to a union — while explicitly exempting favored unions, including those representing law enforcement, firefighters and first responders.

Why would an “anti-union” bill create a special class of protected unions? Why target teachers?

You’ll have to ask the authors or the private business interests backing this bill despite the fact that the legislation deals only with public sector employees.

The Association of Texas Professional Educators is the state’s largest educator organization. A bipartisan organization existing only in Texas, we provide insurance and advocacy for more than 100,000 members. ATPE is not a union. Membership is voluntary. We support right to work. We are against strikes, exclusive consultation and collective bargaining in the field of education. We advocate for high standards for educators, accountability and for an exemplary public education to be offered to every child in Texas.

As with numerous professional associations, health care organizations, and charities, many of our members choose to deduct their contributions directly from their paychecks. Without involving credit cards or checks, payroll deduction virtually eliminates the risk of identity theft. It’s the simplest and most convenient method, and it allows school employees — some of whom don’t have a credit card — the ability to safely and reliably manage their contributions. The process incurs no cost to school districts, which are entitled under current law to charge associations for any extra administrative effort.

In a capitol that has seen no end of legislative chicanery, SB 13 and HB 510 are crooked as a bucket of fish hooks. Educators have long fought to protect class sizes, strengthen school services, and reduce the emphasis on standardized testing. By making membership in educator associations as burdensome as possible, these bills are designed to hurt teachers and students.

Lawmakers wisely shelved similar legislation last session — and we urge them to do so again. The deceptive marketing of these bills should be the first clue: They are ill-conceived and unnecessary political instruments that serve no public interest. The bills’ authors have yet to explain why they believe the state should pick and choose which professions get a voice in the Texas Capitol.

Instead of attacking teachers, let’s focus on ensuring all kids have access to the best schools and services in the country. It’s a job big enough to take us all working together, even as special interests try to pull us apart.

Godsey is executive director of the Association of Texas Professional Educators.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Two Views: Texas tree ordinances are eminent domain in all but name
Two Views: Texas tree ordinances are eminent domain in all but name

During the current special session, the Texas Legislature will address the seemingly simple question: Who owns the tree in your backyard? Nearly 50 municipalities in Texas have ordinances preventing landowners from removing trees from their private property without receiving the city’s permission — and they often require property owners...
Letters to the editor: July 24, 2017
Letters to the editor: July 24, 2017

Like many others, I find it strange that a state government that styles itself as conservative — against “big” government, and in favor of citizens’ rights — would be against local governments establishing ordinances to protect their trees. Is it that those trying to micromanage us from Austin are so deep into the pockets...
Opinion: Why would you want Putin as a friend?

Leaving aside the question as to whether there was actual collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government during the 2016 election, it is undisputed that candidate Donald Trump was eager for a friendship between our two nations. The most recent accounts of the president seeking out more one-on-one time with Putin at the G-20 dinner...
COMMENTARY: Wait for Trump to sabotage your health care

Is Trumpcare finally dead? Even now, it’s hard to be sure, especially given Republican moderates’ long track record of caving in to extremists at crucial moments. But it does look as if the frontal assault on the Affordable Care Act has failed. And let’s be clear: The reason this assault failed wasn’t that Donald Trump did a...
Opinion: This isn't the first U.S. opiate-addiction crisis
Opinion: This isn't the first U.S. opiate-addiction crisis

The U.S. is in the throes of an "unprecedented opioid epidemic," the Centers for Disease Control reports. The crisis has spurred calls for action to halt the rising death toll, which has devastated many rural communities. It's true that there's an opioid epidemic, a public health disaster. It's not true that it's unprecedented. A remarkably...
More Stories