breaking news

Sources: Trump assistant to be top federal prosecutor in Central Texas

Commentary: Texas Legislature votes to restrict policyholders’ rights


Texas lawmakers are on the fast track to restrict policyholders’ rights when their insurance companies fail to pay property insurance claims arising out of weather events, such as storms involving heavy winds and hail.

Now that the Texas Senate has approved House Bill 1774, Gov. Greg Abbott is almost sure to sign it. Unfortunately, this will unleash unexpected and unpleasant surprises for Texas businesses and other insurance policyholders.

Most significantly, this harmful piece of legislation is designed to cut back on penalties that are intended to deter bad-faith conduct by insurance companies. It also aims to empower policyholders to fight back when their claims are denied, delayed or handled in inappropriate ways.

The new legislation seeks to diminish these substantial penalties that previous Texas Legislatures created to deter such bad-faith conduct by insurance companies. Interest that can be awarded by Texas courts for certain property insurance claims would drop from 18 percent to 10 percent. This is a dramatic reduction in the damages that can be awarded against insurers — and the impact must be understood as encouraging abuse and delay by insurers.

WE SAY…: Read the latest opinions from the Statesman’s editorial board.

The legislation would also restrict policyholders’ rights to recover attorney’s fees unless they complied with complicated notification and presuit demand requirements. Even if an insurance company attempts to lowball a payment for years — and an attorney is required to file suit to obtain a full payment — the insurance company may be relieved of responsibility for the policyholder’s fees. Under the proposed law, this will depend on a comparison between the amount demanded and the amount awarded, or whether the policyholder complied with the notification and demand requirements.

This provision has potential to harm policyholders who do not recognize — and comply with — the new notice and demand requirements. Worse, it perversely discourages policyholders from pursuing claims that could be more difficult to prove at the outset of the dispute — or settling portions of claims during the period between a demand and a final resolution.

This so-called “tort reform” is far broader than its proponents have suggested in their public statements. For example, Abbott and others have advocated for the bill based on alleged abuse of “hailstorm” claims by attorneys primarily representing homeowners, stating that “hailstorm litigation is the newest form of lawsuit abuse.”

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW: When big news breaks, we send Breaking News emails. Click to sign up.

However, the new bill does not appear to be restricted to hailstorm claims asserted by homeowners. Indeed, the most recent text applies to a first-party claim filed by any policyholder for property damage caused in whole, or in part, by “forces of nature.” This can include damages suffered by Texas businesses — not just by hailstorms, but also earthquakes, ground movement, wildfires, floods, tornados, lightning, hurricanes, wind, rain and snow.

Texas HB 1774 is woefully overinclusive in its reach and would impact insurance claims that have nothing to do with hail damage to residential properties. Worse, it is likely to harm individuals and Texas businesses that suffer property damage or business interruption losses with a wide variety of actual or potential causes. By removing several of the most reliable tools Texas policyholders have previously used to protect themselves from abusive behavior by insurers, this new law is a major setback.

Cooper and Debevec are partners in the Houston and Philadelphia offices of Reed Smith LLP.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

John Young: Trump: a man with no soul (he pawned it)
John Young: Trump: a man with no soul (he pawned it)

Adventures in spinelessness. The year Jesse Owens burned bright under Nazism’s glare, a grave injustice was obscured beneath the Olympic flame. Avery Brundage, head of the U.S. Olympic Committee, held out two American Jewish sprinters from the 1936 Games so as not to anger Adolph Hitler should Jews mount the medal stand. Why? Simple: Brundage...
Opinion: Trump should condemn racists and alt-left

Dear Mr. President, After your initial remarks addressing the tragedy that occurred in Charlottesville, Virginia, I wrote that you were correct. I agreed with you, and honest scrutiny of the facts of what occurred there that day bear out, that bigotry and violence were on display on “many sides.” But this effort to soothe and unify the...
Commentary: A second special session would stir up a million teachers
Commentary: A second special session would stir up a million teachers

The 85th Texas Legislature just completed a tumultuous special session, tasked by Gov. Greg Abbott to tackle 20 subjects not addressed to his liking during the regular session. The special session was an engineered opportunity for a legislative bonus round, necessitated after critical sunset legislation affecting medical licensure did not pass in May...
Commentary: Why the faith community’s silence on racism is deafening
Commentary: Why the faith community’s silence on racism is deafening

In April 1963, I was a 10-year-old boy living in my hometown of Birmingham, Ala. Martin Luther King, Jr. had been arrested and was in the Birmingham jail after participating in a march against racism and racial segregation. I vaguely remember my father, who was also a preacher and King’s friend and college mate, speaking with other African-American...
Letters to the editor

Re: Aug. 16 commentary, “Phillips: Is Patrick lieutenant governor or viceroy? Let voters decide.” Viewpoints writer Alberta Phillips observes that Texans are not people ruled by a viceroy. I don’t think the lieutenant governor and the governor ever got that memo. They are royalty who fabricate stories. Dan Patrick once said, &ldquo...
More Stories