You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Commentary: Texas can raise the age and keep youth, communities safe


Few Texans would want to be judged their entire life based on what they did or who they were when they were 17 — an age when most of us were in high school.

However, Texas is one of only seven states where all 17- year-old offenders are placed in the adult justice system. “Raising the age” of juvenile court jurisdiction so that 17-year-olds will presumptively go into the juvenile justice system will help enhance community safety and manage tax dollars effectively.

Recently, the Justice Policy Institute released a report that shows how other states “raised the age” without breaking the bank — which should give comfort to policymakers in Texas considering this issue. In “Raising the Age: Shifting to a more effective juvenile justice system,” the Institute profiles what happened in states that absorbed 16-or-17-year-olds — or both — into their youth justice system from the adult court, and how the change happened without spiking taxpayer costs.

After Illinois and Massachusetts absorbed 17-year-olds into their youth justice system, taxpayer costs were kept in check and juvenile crime continued to fall. While legislators initially feared that raising the age would come with a hefty price tag, juvenile corrections costs were kept in check as these states started serving older teenagers.

In Illinois, justice system stakeholders thought they might need new courtrooms and new attorneys to handle thousands of more youth. Instead, the system managed the change with existing dollars while also closing three costly youth facilities. In Massachusetts, the costs of raising the age were 37 percent less than what they were estimated to be.

The reason Texans can raise the age and avoid a spike in juvenile-corrections costs is that we have been working for a decade to adopt better youth-justice policies that are helping improve community safety and allow the state to reallocate dollars from costly facilities to more effective community-based approaches.

Though it can cost Texans $150,000 or more to incarcerate a young person for one year, the youth justice system can reallocate resources to serve more youth in a more cost-effective way by continuing to shift to practices to keep more youth at home as we raise the age.

Raising the age also keeps young people safe, which saves taxpayers money and gives young people their best shot at safely transitioning to adulthood.

Under the national standards of the federal Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), youth under 18 held in adult facilities must be separated from adults for their protection from abuse. Under PREA, governors must assure or certify that adult facilities operated or contracted by the state take costly steps to keep young people separated from adults while a youth is incarcerated, which might mean spending money retrofitting facilities.

In Texas, Massachusetts, Illinois and Louisiana, law enforcement and elected officials called for raising the age laws to comply with PREA and to keep youth safe while avoiding facility construction.

Raising the age will also keep Texas communities safer. Research from the Centers on Disease Control and the U.S. Department of Justice show that young people are less likely to reoffend if they are kept out of adult courts, jails and prisons. Less juvenile crime also means fewer crime victims in Texas, less cost associated with crime and fewer youth ending up coursing through our courts, jails and prisons. Additionally, 17 year-olds who commit serious felonies such as murder or rape could still be tried as adults.

Texas lawmakers should raise the age and give young people a chance to become productive adults who will be working, contributing to the tax base, and playing a role in building our communities throughout their lives. Lawmakers can raise the age knowing that their revamped youth justice system will keep communities safer and keep youth safe at the same time — all while keeping costs in check.

Levin is policy director of Right on Crime and the director of the Center for Effective Justice at the Texas Public Policy Foundation.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: June 24, 2017
Letters to the editor: June 24, 2017

Re: June 16 photo, “1,100 boys try their hand at governing Texas.” I was dismayed on so many levels that the boys at Boys State, an event sponsored by the American Legion no less, voted for Texas to secede from the United States! Where are the idealistic thoughts of making this country a better nation? It speaks volumes about the environment...
Commentary: Language barrier shouldn’t be a barrier to democracy
Commentary: Language barrier shouldn’t be a barrier to democracy

Though voting should be a simple process, it’s undeniable that some people face more obstacles at the polls than others. When English is not your first language, the voting process can be especially difficult. Though a controversial voter ID law here has grabbed national headlines, fewer Texans know about the state’s more obscure voting...
Commentary: How Senate health bill raises health costs for everyone
Commentary: How Senate health bill raises health costs for everyone

As Congress wrestles with replacing the Affordable Care Act, a big question is where they will finally land with Medicaid. Rolling back Medicaid hurts our country’s safety net by taking coverage away from millions of Americans — many of whom are low-income, working adults who aren’t offered health insurance through their employers...
Commentary: Why Dawnna Dukes’ incumbency is misguiding Democrats
Commentary: Why Dawnna Dukes’ incumbency is misguiding Democrats

I was dismayed to read a broadside from Vincent Harding, chairman of the Travis County Democratic Party, purporting to explain his heavy-handed refusal to allow a vote on a resolution calling for the resignation of state Rep. Dawnna Dukes. That resolution might or might not have passed. That’s why votes are held. I’ve served five terms...
Letters to the editor: June 23, 2017
Letters to the editor: June 23, 2017

Re: June 15 article, “Austin requires a permit for kids’ lemonade stands. Troxclair wants to change that.” So, this is why there is a lag at City Hall. How much time and rhetoric energy have gone on about removal of this code? How much time was spent to make this a city code anyway? Now, the “department is in the process of...
More Stories