Commentary: 11 reasons Austin will lose the affordable housing battle


Austin is in a housing crisis. The poor cannot afford rents that are the third-highest in Texas. Middle-income families must look to the suburbs for affordable housing. Within 10 years, the city will need 60,000 new housing units for low-income families, plus another 75,000 market-rate units, according to the city of Austin’s Strategic Housing Blueprint, which the City Council adopted last April.

What are city officials doing to address the crisis? Not much — other than adopting plans, creating task forces and recycling old ideas. Also, and paradoxically, many city actions have made housing even less affordable. Examples follow:

• Endless increases in city property taxes have driven up the cost of housing for all. The City Council raised taxes every year during the past 10 years and is poised to increase taxes yet again this month.

CONTINUING COVERAGE: Proposed Austin budget raises taxes, fees $178 for typical homeowner.

• Claims that relentless tax hikes are driven by population growth are political rhetoric. Though the city’s population has increased by 13 percent since 2011, property tax collections grew by 31 percent.

• High property taxes are perpetuated by the city’s tiny homestead exemption. Recently, the council “indefinitely postponed” an increase in the exemption from six to 14 percent because of the revenue “loss” that would result. More City Council spending trumped housing affordability. (Note: Travis County provides a 20-percent homestead exemption.)

• The City Council also rejected the use of property tax caps to bolster housing affordability. On a 6-5 vote, the City Council defeated a proposal to begin the annual budget process with a static, no-increase property tax rate. Concerns over limiting spending carried the day.

• Though they have little hands-on construction knowledge, city officials shun the builders and developers who hold the key to the affordable-housing kingdom. This is the reason there are no builders or developers on the City Council nor Zoning and Platting Commission. Also notable: The city has never hosted an inclusive meeting of the experts who actually put housing on the ground.

POLITIFACT: Adler’s 20-percent exemption promise unfulfilled.

• Despite its urgency, the city is taking a leisurely approach to the housing crisis. CodeNext, which revises the city’s disjointed zoning regulations to incentivize housing construction, was completed last January, but the City Council approval won’t be until April 2018. Adopting administrative rules will add more delay as the housing crisis exacerbates.

• The city is doubling down on flawed affordable housing options that don’t work. A premier example is the city’s “density bonus” program, which grants zoning waivers to developers willing to fund low-income housing. Since 2007, the program has produced a miniscule average of 128 low-income units per year. Nevertheless, the program will be continued.

• Many in the housing industry say the city has the toughest anti-affordability development regulations in the state. Also, Austin’s development fees, which have almost doubled since 2012, are the highest in the state among major cities.

• Building homes is impossible in many areas due to minimum lot sizes and other restrictions that have been put in place over the years. Reforms have not been forthcoming.

• The City Council is unwilling to put meaningful fiscal skin in the affordable housing game, which is why fewer general fund dollars are spent on housing than on animal shelters. Instead, the city relies on no-cost federal housing tax credits and developer incentives.

VOTE TRACKER: The Statesman is logging the City Council’s votes on high-interest issues.

• Ironically, neighborhood associations may undermine CodeNext, whose main purpose is to increase central city density. Fearing a wave of more people and more businesses, some groups are insisting that their areas be grandfathered out of CodeNext.

The City Council approved a housing master plan four months ago. Rather than waiting months or years to implement the plan, the council must commence a reregulation of its land development requirements. Per the plan, the council should enact a timely variety of simple changes, such as reducing parking requirements (at a savings of $20,000 to $30,000 per space), allowing smaller homes on smaller lots and allowing “granny flats” and other accessory dwelling units citywide.

Curiously, many of the reforms recommended in the master plan might be opposed by the same City Council members who adopted the targeted policies in the first place.

Brown is a governmental consultant who lives in West Lake Hills.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Herman: Free speech, our president and our favorite Sunday pastime
Herman: Free speech, our president and our favorite Sunday pastime

As long as we’re having this important free-speech conversation, and hoping this conversation leads to the important race-relations conversation, let’s make sure it’s properly framed: It most definitely is about freedom of speech, but maybe not in the way some people think. President Donald Trump, having successfully solved all of...
Commentary: Trump isn’t urging patriotism; he’s provoking a culture war
Commentary: Trump isn’t urging patriotism; he’s provoking a culture war

Once again, President Donald Trump has inserted himself into the latest iteration of the culture wars with his recent comments targeting Golden State Warriors star Stephen Curry and the National Football League. Whether it’s criticizing the removal of Confederate statues or equating anti-fascist protesters with white supremacists, make no mistake...
Letters to the editor: Sept. 26, 2017

Re: Sept. 21 article, “Kitchen calls to name Robert E. Lee Road for only black U.S. treasurer.” As a resident of the Zilker neighborhood, I applaud Austin City Council Member Ann Kitchen’s proposal to rename Robert E. Lee Road for Azie Taylor Morton, who by all accounts was a patriotic and honorable local resident. Lee, most assuredly...
Commentary: Dell Medical School delivers on promise of healthier city
Commentary: Dell Medical School delivers on promise of healthier city

Five years ago, Travis County voters did something powerful: They created a medical school funded by local property tax dollars with an unprecedented focus on the community — especially those who’ve suffered from health inequities. The Dell Medical School at the University of Texas is still a startup. I arrived as dean in 2014; last summer...
Viewpionts: Young would-be voters should learn value of their ballots
Viewpionts: Young would-be voters should learn value of their ballots

When the time comes to teach kids about voting, Austin High School government teachers Rolando Duarte and Stephanie Harris provide students with a robust, engaging lesson plan that includes voter registration drives, schoolwide mock elections and daily conversations about current events and hot-button issues. Their approach, studies suggest, help build...
More Stories