You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Commentary: Quality of product is as important as how it is marketed


In his recently published column, “Better progressive strategy,” David Overton compares the marketing of the liberal/progressive (modern Democrats) “products” vs. the conservative (modern Republicans) “products..” If one peels the onion back, however, it’s fairly obvious Democrats have the better “product” for ordinary people and Republicans have the better “product” for business owners and the wealthy.

In the early years of the 20th century, thanks principally to Teddy Roosevelt, Republicans were the progressives and Democrats, which owned the south politically, were state’s rights conservatives. LBJ’s aggressive sponsorship of the 1965 Civil Rights Act instantaneously flipped this 180 degrees.

Over the past century, every consequential piece of social legislation impacting the working class and poor was proposed by progressives and opposed by conservatives, including a woman’s right to vote nearly 100 years ago, Social Security, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, right to unionize, workplace safety, Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, voting rights, environmental protection, unemployment insurance, food stamps and the disabilities. The list goes on.

The earliest in the last century was a women’s right to vote. It was promoted by progressives from both parties, and opposed, principally by conservative Democrats in the south. Both parties claim credit for women’s suffrage, but it was less a single party accomplishment than a progressive one.

Nearly 20 percent of all American’s receive social security benefits.

Thirty years later when LBJ proposed Medicare legislation, this is how Ronald Reagan, characterized it: “If Medicare passes into law, the consequences will be dire beyond imagining,” Reagan said. If opponents failed to scuttle it, he warned, “One of these days you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.” Sound familiar?

Forty-five years later, when President Obama proposed the Affordable Care Act, Republican 2008 V.P. candidate Sarah Palin said: “The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of [President Barack] Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.” Uh, huh.

Republicans sell simple talking points — lower taxes, small government, family values, strong military — while their behavior often belies them. Democrats have no such equivalent simplistic talking points. They just assiduously propose life-enhancing social legislation.

Faced with governing, Trump now will surely retain the essence of Obamacare but will call it Trumpcare. Democrats mis-marketed Obamacare by focusing on its features, not it’s benefits. Marketing 101 teaches that features do not sell, only benefits sell. Benefits such as 20 million previously uninsured citizens and their families will now enjoy an improved quality of life and peace of mind; benefits like banning rejections based on pre-existing medical conditions; benefits like carrying children under their parent’s insurance til age 26. Republicans will market the benefits with memorable talking points.

Yes, modern Democrats fail at both marketing and winning, while modern Republicans are quite competent at messaging thanks to cynical word-massagers like Frank Lunz and winning. Democrats market to voter’s heads while Republicans market to voter’s gut. And the biggest driver of the “gut” is fear and Republicans use it brilliantly.

If Democrats haven’t figured out how to market itself yet, its doubtful they can. It may be congenital. Consequently, I can only hope Republicans try to dismantle (they will call in “privatize”) Democratic programs like Obamacare, Social Security and Medicare. They will reap their just rewards in 2018 and 2020.

Rygler is an Austin resident.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Jack Hunter: Be aware of unelected officials who steer government
Jack Hunter: Be aware of unelected officials who steer government

Long before Donald Trump became president and his top national security adviser Michael Flynn was accused of treason, there was concern about a “deep state” in the U.S. “The phrase ‘deep state’ is popping up ever more in public discussions,” wrote libertarian Jeffrey Tucker in 2014: “What does it mean? It refers...
Herman: Wrestling with gender identity
Herman: Wrestling with gender identity

As we navigate the brave and befuddling new world of gender identity, Mack Beggs was inevitable. And so was Madeline Rocha. Both are accomplished high school athletes to be celebrated for the time and sweat it takes to become such, especially in their grueling sport of choice. Beggs, 17, of Euless Trinity High School, heads to Cypress this week to...
Commentary: Picking fights with Mexico will be at our own peril
Commentary: Picking fights with Mexico will be at our own peril

The relationship between the United States and Mexico is at a historic low. Months of threats and Mexico-bashing by President Donald Trump have left our neighbors to the south with a mixture of anger, resentment and anxiety. The rhetoric has created a breach that threatens to become a profound chasm. We need to remember that while Mexico needs the...
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 21, 2017
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 21, 2017

Re: Jan. 27 article, “Why Trump’s border wall won’t be easy to build in Texas.” Dear Gov. Abbott, I am concerned about the future of some of our iconic landmarks in West Texas. Namely I’m worried about Big Bend National Park, Balmorhea State Park and the McDonald Observatory. These places must remain preserved, pristine...
Mona Charen: Patriotism, not nationalism
Mona Charen: Patriotism, not nationalism

National Review has sparked an important debate about nationalism. As someone who has been accused throughout her life of excessive love of country (can’t count the number of times I’ve been reproached for arguing that despite slavery, Jim Crow and the internment of Japanese-Americans, our country is eminently lovable), I feel a bit awkward...
More Stories