Commentary: A look at America’s deadly disasters and ‘alternative facts’

Hurricane season isn’t over. There are still tropical storms churning in the Atlantic Ocean, threatening to make landfall. Scientists say it’s not a coincidence that three monster storms made landfall within a month: It’s climate change. President Donald Trump says it’s not, but he is wrong and he is pushing a deadly agenda. Trump’s “alternative facts” about the environment have cost Americans millions of dollars and threaten our lives.

Our country has been hammered by one deadly environmental disaster after another: Dozens of wildfires have charred western states. Deadly hurricanes have destroyed some of America’s most beautiful coastal towns, including some in Texas. It’s likely to take years for Houston, Port Aransas and areas in between to recover.

WHITE HOUSE: Trump says Texas recovery from Harvey a success.

A new report from Congress’ top watchdog group, the Government Accountability Office, found that extreme weather and fires have cost taxpayers more than $350 billion over the past decade. And with Trump in office, that bill will surely grow. It’s a warning he’s unlikely to heed because his administration is so fond of pushing “alternative facts” about the environment.

And it doesn’t stop there. Trump called climate change “a myth.” He plans to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement and has rolled back the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulations on greenhouse gases. He nominated a toxicologist to the EPA who once endorsed high levels of pesticides in drinking water. And the administration refuses to admit that deadly storms such as Hurricanes Harvey and Irma might have been bolstered by polluters.

An apathetic government in the wake of a deadly environmental disaster is a dangerous case of history repeating itself.

Sixty-five years ago, the British government encouraged unregulated use of a dirty fuel, sparking the world’s deadliest air pollution disaster, the Great Smog of 1952, which killed 12,000 Londoners.

VIEWPOINTS: Texas should keep promise to Harvey-hit school districts.

In 1952, London was the world’s most populated city and the most industrial. More than 8 million people were crammed in an area about twice the size of New York City. December was the coldest month that year, and during the first week, London sat under an anticyclone for five days — a temperature inversion of high atmospheric pressure. Warm air trapped colder air on the ground, sealing a lid over the city.

Winston Churchill’s conservative government encouraged Londoners to buy the cheap, dirty coal that caused the worst of the smog. But the conservative government used its own “alternative facts” to skew how Londoners viewed air pollution.

The head of pollution investigations showed Churchill’s ministers a chart that showed that while 4,000 people died within weeks of the fog, another 8,000 died within the following three months, bringing the total to 12,000.

Churchill’s ministers panicked and changed the chart, the version that would be later released to the public. They admitted that 4,000 Londoners did die from the fog, but the additional 8,000 actually succumbed to an influenza epidemic.

It was a lie. There was never a flu epidemic during that period. Records prove it.

COMMENTARY: Add legal aid to the list of ways to help Harvey victims.

But Londoners in 1952 trusted their government. They hoped that such a long fog would never happen again. They hoped it was a fluke caused by a freak weather occurrence. But people continued to die, year after year. If they had only known the truth, maybe they would have elected politicians who might have forced a change.

Now, more than 60 years later, another world leader and his administration are risking our lives. There will be more super storms, more wildfires, more floods, more infrastructure damage, more related blows to local and regional economies, more money spent and more deaths. Trump and his administration stand in the way of scientists working to prevent even deadlier environmental disasters to come.

An apathetic government is as dangerous as a malevolent one — something voters should remember during next year’s midterm elections.

Dawson is a senior lecturer of journalism at the University of Texas.

SPECIAL REPORT: Port Aransas faces long road to recovery.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Feb. 26, 2018

Where is your outrage, President Trump? The Mueller investigation uncovered possibly the most concentrated effort at election tampering in our history, yet you seem strangely unfazed. In fact, your overriding emotion appears to be relief that you are personally exonerated. A fair electoral process is the cornerstone of our democracy — and any...
Commentary: How one lawyer proves her faith in criminal rehabilitation
Commentary: How one lawyer proves her faith in criminal rehabilitation

Any criminal justice system has two purposes: The first is to punish those who have broken the law; the second is to bring about rehabilitation in the lawbreaker, so that he or she will turn his back on a life of crime and embrace a law-abiding life in society. The first is accomplished largely within the closed ranks of the legal system, through courts...
Opinion: Is Trump guilty, or does he just look guilty?

When absorbing news about the Mueller investigation, I can’t help thinking of Saddam Hussein. No, I’m not equating our president with the late Iraqi dictator. I’m thinking more about our assumptions regarding Saddam’s guilt. In the run-up to the Iraq War, the whole world was asking whether Saddam had a secret program for weapons...
Opinion: The content of the GOP’s character

Even those who have long since accepted the premise that Donald Trump is corrupt, self-centered and dishonest seem a bit shocked by his tirades over the Presidents Day weekend. Using the Parkland, Florida, massacre as an excuse to attack the FBI for investigating Russian election intervention on his behalf — while lying about his own past denials...
Viewpoints: Listen, America. Our kids have something to say about guns

The national gun debate has a new, youthful face. This time children are the grown-ups driving the discussion, and they have something to say. We should all listen. Who knows whether we will one day look on the students’ activism as a tipping point for seismic change? For now, there’s no denying their movement is extraordinary and is reverberating...
More Stories