Commentary: How Texas can chart a new course in mobility


The wrath of Hurricane Harvey — and with it, the third 500-year flood Texas has suffered in the last three years — left behind scenes of massive destruction and loss of life, property, and in some instances, hope.

But, we also see hope for a new future. Texas can access new technologies and solutions to leave it better prepared to withstand and recover from extreme weather events. By doing so, Texas has an opportunity to lead the nation in building a new mobility future: one founded upon shared, electric and autonomous mobility services in cities designed primarily for people instead of cars. This approach not only promises lower costs and cleaner air but would also strengthen the resilience of the state’s grid and provide backup power when it’s needed most.

With as many as 1 million cars destroyed by Harvey, Texas stands at a key inflection point in determining its mobility system of the future. Repeating the historical approach — replacing the 1 million vehicles lost with new, personally owned gasoline-fueled cars — would return Texas to where it was before Harvey made landfall. It would recommit Texans to more carbon emissions and more congestion and consign insurance companies to pay billions of dollars for new assets that sit unused — parked — 95 percent of the time.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

Fortunately, thanks to complementary innovation across the transportation and electricity sectors, Texas can chart a new course. It can realize new mobility: a future where most mobility needs are met by mobility services, enabled by autonomous driving technology, and powered by electric powertrains.

Powerful economic, environmental, technological and social forces are driving this seismic shift in how people get around. Bloomberg New Energy Finance, for example, anticipates that by 2020, 39 models of plug-in electric hybrid vehicles and 44 models of electric vehicles will be available in North America.

The world’s largest automakers, including GM, Toyota, and Ford, have publicly committed to delivering autonomous vehicles to the market — and faster than even the most optimistic forecasters predict. The world’s largest technology companies, including Google, Apple, Uber, and Lyft, are developing and demonstrating hardware and software to support and operate those vehicles.

The benefits of new mobility to communities are massive. In all, Rocky Mountain Institute estimates a transition away from a mobility system designed around personally owned gasoline-powered vehicles could lead to nearly $1 trillion annually in efficiencies. Those savings would be captured by pioneering new-mobility service providers, local governments, and most importantly, consumers like you and us.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: Our Lone Star Politics page brings Texas news to your Facebook feed.

Promising pilot projects are already underway that can help guide Texas toward this pathway. Rocky Mountain Institute has partnered with the city of Austin — alongside transit authorities, transportation companies, universities, technology providers, local businesses, and other Texas Smart Cities — to enhance Austin’s mobility system. Projects include commuting solutions, electric fleet service vehicles, electric vehicle-grid integration, autonomous vehicle pilots, interoperable transportation data, and new-mobility-oriented development.

Texas can also learn from California, where a fleet of electric vehicles and bidirectional charging stations now are in place at Los Angeles Air Force Base. Through EV-grid technology, these vehicles can push energy back to the grid and provide a reliable source of backup electricity. The Air Force expects the program to cut fuel and maintenance costs, improve grid reliability, and cut pollution and carbon emissions.

Former Texas Governor and U.S. Senator Sam Houston once said: “Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from whatever source it may.” As Texans rebuild and look to the battles ahead, new mobility promises to only strengthen that famous resolve.

Jerry Weiland and Todd Zeranski are with the Rocky Mountain Institute.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Commentary: For weddings in Hays County, count on guns and roses
Commentary: For weddings in Hays County, count on guns and roses

Gregory George, 41, is a former Texas General Land Office right-of-way agent. His wife Staci, 38, is a financial adviser in Austin. Until recently, they lived in a 1,400-square foot home in Manchaca. In 2013, they bought 10.9 acres of land on FM 967 between Buda and Driftwood. “Our dream always had been to buy a little piece of acreage in the...
Letters to the editor: Feb. 23, 2018
Letters to the editor: Feb. 23, 2018

Re: Feb. 18 article, “Playing to an audience of one, Dan Patrick doesn’t need your approval.” The article did a good job capturing Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s lack of interest in good policies for our communities that government is supposed to oversee, like public education, transportation and water resources Instead, Patrick just...
Opinion: A case for small steps to fix a big gun problem
Opinion: A case for small steps to fix a big gun problem

In the effort to reduce gun violence, or gun massacres, should we go big or go small? Should we concentrate on steps that have a consensus behind them, at the risk of not making much difference? Or should we seek to transform American law and culture, even if success looks pitifully unlikely? The movement to regulate gun ownership has pursued both...
Facebook comments: Feb. 23, 2018
Facebook comments: Feb. 23, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Melissa Taboada, Austin Independent School District trustees are nearing a vote on whether to change school names with ties to the Confederacy. Two meetings were held this week this week to accept feedback from the community on the proposal to rename five campuses. At the meetings, the goal was to provide...
Opinion: Gun control about saving lives, not waging culture wars

WASHINGTON — You have perhaps heard the joke about the liberal who is so open-minded that he can’t even take his own side in an argument. What’s less funny is that on gun control, liberals have been told for years that if they do take their own side in the argument, they will only hurt their cause. Supporters of even modest restrictions...
More Stories