Commentary: Hailstorm lawsuit reform protects consumers


First we get hit with high-intensity storms that pummeled parts of our state this past week with large hail. Next, we get soaked by storm-chasing personal injury lawyers looking to line their pockets.

Texas is taking a pounding, and it’s time for the Texas Legislature to do their part to stop it. Since we can’t control the weather, let’s tackle abusive hailstorm lawsuits and enact smart reforms.

At Texans Against Lawsuit Abuse, we have watched the threats and costs mount in recent years. From direct mail and billboards and solicitations at public events or door to door, plaintiffs are aggressively recruited.

In 2014, a study by the Rio Grande Valley Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse found that in the two years after significant hailstorms in Hidalgo County in 2012, nearly 6,000 lawsuits were filed. Forty percent of those suits were filed by just seven personal injury lawyers. Many of these lawsuits shows a near identical, cookie-cutter pattern in the hailstorm personal injury lawyers’ approach, claims and demands.

That trend is no longer limited to South Texas.

According to the Texas Department of Insurance, weather-related litigation jumped 1,400 percent statewide after 2011.

When you see growing numbers of lawsuits like this, there’s reason to worry that they’re burdening our courts, driving up consumer and business insurance costs and limiting or eliminating access to coverage for some Texans.

And there’s data that show the impact on consumers is already being felt. The Department of Insurance found that seven insurers have reduced, limited or stopped writing insurance policies because of hailstorm litigation, while 12 companies have hiked rates for homeowners’ policies as a direct result of lawsuits.

So, what’s the fix?

House Bill 1774 and Senate Bill 10 offer a reasonable solution to the skyrocketing number of hailstorm lawsuits being filed in Texas by putting an end to the gaming of the system by some personal injury lawyers.

Yet, we hear critics argue, as Chris Tomlinson did in his recent Houston Chronicle column, that the bills protect insurers, not consumers. Unfortunately, that’s off the mark, but it’s a popular refrain from those who truly stand to lose the most if hailstorm lawsuit reform passes: personal injury lawyers.

The same storm-chasing lawyers who stand to make more than $400 million in legal fees off these cases are the ones showing the strongest and loudest opposition to reform. It’s about fattening their wallets rather than helping a property owner get whole.

The proposed legislative fix protects property owners from all the bad actors, whether it’s an insurance company or a lawyer. Both SB 10 and HB 1774 ensure Texans maintain their ability to sue their insurer, while common-sense provisions would be put in place to allow for needed predictability in the system.

Every single one of the seven causes of action — reasons under existing law that a homeowner can sue — that are available to a property owner today will remain available after these bills pass. There is a clear path to the courthouse for those with legitimate disputes with their insurers.

What’s most promising about this effort to reform is that Sen. Kelly Hancock and Rep. Greg Bonnen have worked tirelessly with all stakeholders to ensure the current legislation is a narrow, targeted bill that fixes a specific, major problem.

I’ve been on the front lines of lawsuit reform with many of my fellow Texans and small business owners. The same people who are opposed to hailstorm lawsuit reform today have been opposed to every major piece of reform that has been passed in the last 20 years.

We need reform. We can’t control the weather, but we can work to stop lawsuit abuse.

Meaux is on the board of Texans Against Lawsuit Abuse, a statewide consumer and small business organization that educates and advocates for lawsuit reform.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

George F. Will: The slovenly institution that is Congress
George F. Will: The slovenly institution that is Congress

WASHINGTON — In January 1988, in Ronald Reagan’s final State of the Union address, he noisily dropped on a table next to the podium in the House chamber three recent continuing resolutions, each more than a thousand pages long. Each was evidence of Congress’ disregard of the 1974 Budget Act. Reagan fumed: ” … budget deadlines...
Kathleen Parker: Poor everyone
Kathleen Parker: Poor everyone

WASHINGTON — Eventually, everyone in this town seems to wind up with the word “poor” in front of his or her name. Such a fate is especially likely if one has associated with Donald Trump. As in, Poor Attorney General Jeff Sessions. He is latest to the firing line that has included such formerlys as FBI Director James Comey, national...
Commentary: Why the ‘genius’ of South Terminal works for millennials
Commentary: Why the ‘genius’ of South Terminal works for millennials

This past weekend, I had the pleasure of heading home to Cincinnati on the Allegiant nonstop flight out of the South Terminal at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport. My experience heading home included a ticketing agent being cussed at by a passenger who had no clue how to get to the new terminal; a nonexistent TSA PreCheck (oh, the agony!); and...
Herman: Again, Texas’ bathroom bill a solution in search of a problem
Herman: Again, Texas’ bathroom bill a solution in search of a problem

One of the more anticipated summer re-runs at Your Texas Capitol aired Tuesday as GOP senators, against the advice of cops, advanced the bathroom bill. That’s the thing with reruns — they always come out the same. Or do they? We’ll find out when the bill gets to the House. During the regular session, the House OK’d a version...
Opinion: Liberal teachers’ union wrong to equate freedom with racism

Randi Weingarten, president of the nation’s second-largest teachers union, the American Federation of Teachers, used a speech last week to brand the education choice movement as racist. She also got personal, trying to pin the racist label onto Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos because DeVos is a passionate supporter of parents being able to...
More Stories