Commentary: ‘Blue tarp bills’ threaten Texas property owners


Your property rights are under assault at the Texas Capitol. Insurance lobbyists and their allies at the self-styled “Texans for Lawsuit Reform” are pushing legislation that will mean insurance companies pay you as little as late as possible for claims.

House Bill 1774 and Senate Bill 10, better known as the “blue tarp bills,” strengthen the hand of insurance companies in property-claims disputes. The end result is homes, businesses, schools and churches will be blanketed in blue tarps after storms when they’re cheated out of their policy benefits.

Central Texans are no strangers to bad weather and know the stakes. Protection from nature’s fury is one of the main reasons we buy insurance, though we’ve been paying more for our policies while receiving less in coverage for many years now. We pay our hard-earned premiums each year in exchange for a promise that our insurance company will be there for us in our time of need. But too often, insurers abandon their customers, denying claims and wrongly asserting damage is minimal or pre-existing. They also underpay or delay compensation; the list of games played to pad the bottom line goes on and on.

Insurers of Texas homeowners have made over $4.5 billion in profits since 2012. The longer insurance companies can hold on to our money, the more profits they can reap through investments in the stock market. That’s why we have policyholder protections on the books in Texas. We all know that our system of bureaucratic regulation favors powerful insurers over Texas homeowners and businesses. Only the ability to enforce strong laws in court pries policy benefits back from insurance companies and ensures prompt payment.

The Blue Tarp Bills weaken policyholder protections. The legislation slashes the penalty insurers face for slow payment; forces most insurance disputes into our overburdened federal courts, where it takes twice as long to receive justice; and threatens access to justice for property owners who won’t be made whole if they guess incorrectly before suit about the amount the jury will award. The cost, delay and uncertainty the bills create only works to advantage the insurance company and disadvantage the property owner.

Without the ability to hold your insurance company accountable, you are at their mercy. Is it any wonder, then, that insurance companies and their allies are pushing an agenda at the Capitol to gut your rights? Imagine after the next storm hits, calling your insurance company to make your claim and being told “no.” This is the second storm of insurer abuse, and it’s bearing down on every Texan unless the blue tarp bills are stopped.

Official data shows insurers paid 10 percent fewer hail claims after massive storms and refused to reopen claims files in significant numbers until policyholders were forced to take their claims to court. These trends will only worsen if insurers face less accountability for cheating their customers. Giving insurance companies more power is a recipe for man-made disasters following natural disasters.

Texans don’t want this. A recent survey of active voters conducted by Hill Research Consultants, a nationally respected Republican public research organization, found overwhelming majorities of Texans want to increase or maintain policyholders’ legal rights. The support spanned the political spectrum with 83 percent of Democrats, 87 percent of Republicans, and 89 percent of self-identified tea party supporters holding this position.

Instead of undermining your ability to demand fair treatment, lawmakers should consider stronger legal remedies that impose stiff penalties on insurance companies caught cheating their customers. Though no system is perfect, of course, independent judges and juries do a better job than Austin bureaucrats when it comes to holding insurance companies accountable.

If you agree policyholders should be protected, now is the time to raise your voice in opposition to the blue tarp bills. Lawmakers are hearing from insurance lobbyists each and every day this session — but they were sent to Austin to work for you.

Wendell is the executive director of Texas Watch, a nonpartisan citizen advocacy group that has worked to protect policyholders since 1998.

Wendell is the executive director of Texas Watch, a nonpartisan citizen advocacy group that has worked to protect policyholders since 1998.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Oct. 15, 2017

Re: Sept. 24 article, “Is Austin the landlocked surf capital of the world? Some say yes.” A recent Statesman article highlighted an inland surfing park in Austin that doesn’t rely on boats. It would be great if all the wake surfers on Lake Austin were to take their sport over to the surfing park. Wake surfing relies on really big...
Letters to the editor: Oct. 19, 2017

Re: Oct. 16 article, “CodeNext: Is Austin doing enough to reach out to non-English speakers?” Why translate? If anyone wants to live in the U.S., let them learn the talk of the country. Last I heard, here it was still English. If I moved to Mexico, do you think that they would print everything in English? Of course not. When my ancestors...
Commentary: Let’s build global consensus for reconnecting with nature
Commentary: Let’s build global consensus for reconnecting with nature

During the past few weeks, millions of people around the Gulf of Mexico have experienced the fury of Mother Nature. Four massive hurricanes and two earthquakes have devastated numerous communities. It is humbling to realize that despite enormous technical advancements, we are still as much at the mercy of nature’s wrath as the Teotihuacanos in...
Commentary: Why Hartnett White is dangerous for environmental council
Commentary: Why Hartnett White is dangerous for environmental council

With each new appointee to the Trump administration, it’s like the president is trolling us. Put someone who sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 14 times in charge of the agency? Check. Appoint a man who wanted to eliminate the Department of Energy as its head? Check. But you ain’t seen nothing yet. Trump’s newest choice...
Opinion: Trump’s scary strategy on North Korea

On just the first day of a war between the United States and North Korea, according to a Stanford University assessment, 1 million people could be killed. Yet after my five-day visit to North Korea with three New York Times colleagues, such a nuclear war seems terrifyingly imaginable. In the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, it was clear that President...
More Stories