You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Commentary: In balancing the budget, is a cuts-only approach right?


Of all the decisions that the Texas Legislature will make this year, none may be more important than this: How do we manage the state’s resources in a way that is prudent, responsible and supportive of economic growth?

Over the last two years, state sales tax collections have come in weaker than expected. Meanwhile, Texas has continued to grow as fast as almost any other state; key facilities are in disrepair; and we have committed to spending hundreds of millions of dollars more to protect children from abuse. Add it all up and the state of Texas faces a multibillion-dollar budget shortfall.

The Texas House Appropriations Committee is working diligently to close this shortfall. To be clear, tax increases are not on the table. The committee is making meaningful spending reductions in health care, education, government contracts and economic incentive programs. Texas will continue to have one of the lowest per-capita spending rates in the country.

But should we balance the budget with spending reductions alone?

If we pursue a cuts-only approach, there will be no new per-student resources for public education. The burden for funding education will shift further toward local property taxes. The Legislature will also make deep cuts in higher education, research and student financial aid.

For example, the cuts-only budget proposed earlier this year in the Texas Senate threatens to wipe out a $90 million funding stream for the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. State funding for Texas A&M-San Antonio would be cut in half under that same plan. Other universities are talking about canceling hundreds of classes.

In short, the institutions that we entrust with our future are facing serious setbacks that would harm our entire state. Our economic success begins in our schools, colleges and universities. In order to compete, we need a well-educated workforce with diverse skills.

And the cuts would hardly be limited to education. Across the state, state mental hospitals are crumbling. Without significant repairs, for example, the Rusk State Hospital in East Texas will remain a public health hazard. Nursing homes could be forced to reduce their staffs.

And perhaps nobody should watch this debate closer than the retired teachers who put so many of us on the path to success. There is a $1 billion shortfall in the health care program for retired school employees. Without an injection of hundreds of millions of dollars to address that shortfall, retired teachers could face massive increases in their health insurance deductibles and very sizable increases in monthly premiums.

Of course, there’s more than one path to a balanced budget.

Another idea is to combine spending reductions with a modest withdrawal from the state’s Economic Stabilization Fund, also known as the Rainy Day Fund. The comptroller projects that $12 billion will be in that fund by the end of the next budget cycle. The Legislature has withdrawn money from this savings account seven times since its inception. A little more than a decade ago, the fund was virtually empty. And now its balance is higher than ever.

Ratings agencies say we could maintain the state’s strong credit rating with as little as $5 billion in the fund. Nobody in the Legislature is talking about reducing the balance of the fund to such a low level.

There are some accounting maneuvers that the Legislature can use to lessen the impact of budget cuts. For example, one trick we may use is to delay a payment to school districts by a few days, pushing it into the next budget cycle without any real harm to education. But those bills will eventually come due, and with each delay we use, we put the next Legislature in a deeper hole. The Texas House has worked diligently in recent years to phase out budget gimmick — and we should be extremely careful about bringing even some of those gimmicks back.

Those who serve in public office often compare balancing a government budget to the decisions a family faces when its income dips. Though it’s a flawed metaphor, perhaps it’s worth using this time to illustrate the choices we face: Will we really decide not to buy school supplies for our children because we as parents want to brag about all the money in our savings account?

Republican Joe Straus is speaker of the Texas House.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Herman: Sine die and a possible death threat at Your State Capitol
Herman: Sine die and a possible death threat at Your State Capitol

Sine die got done Monday at Your State Capitol. There was the usual back-slapping camaraderie of the last day of the legislative session. There were happy kids and proud families on hand. And there was a reported death threat from one lawmaker to another. And, no, that’s not the die part of sine die, which is the motion that brings the regular...
Letters to the editor: May 30, 2017
Letters to the editor: May 30, 2017

Re: May 24 article, “Lawmaker circumvents Texas Legislature to address school lunch shaming.” I agree children should not go hungry in school. As one who frequents school cafeterias in the Austin Independent School District, I see the source of hunger coming not from the lack of food available to children, but from children not eating what...
Commentary: Finstas are a window into millennial’s imperfect life
Commentary: Finstas are a window into millennial’s imperfect life

Do you know what a finsta is? Neither did I, because I am not between the ages of 13 and 34. Anyone 13 to 18 is part of Gen Z, and those ages 18 to 34 are the much-discussed millennials. Dan Coates studies them both. His company, Ypulse, is a youth-marketing research firm based in New York, and lately some of its research has been on finstas. Finstas...
Commentary: How SB4 dims hopes for immigrants — and the rest of America
Commentary: How SB4 dims hopes for immigrants — and the rest of America

A student I taught last year — I’ll call her Ana — comes by my classroom at the end of the day to ask if I’ll write a recommendation for her when she applies to colleges next fall. I tell her of course, and ask her if she’s excited to be a senior. She says she is, but she’s nervous. “Why?” I ask. She...
Herman: Dan Patrick assigns blame, wins with likely special session
Herman: Dan Patrick assigns blame, wins with likely special session

And on Sunday, the 139th day of the 140-day regular session of the 2017 Texas Legislature, the blamethrowers came out full blast on both sides of Your State Capitol. And, as usual, the flames of political rhetoric singed the usual bystanders: me, you and our fellow Texans. The inevitable bottom line as the session sputters towards its Monday conclusion...
More Stories