Commentary: 10,000 experts plan to make America ‘evidence-based’ again

Ten thousand of the nation’s leading scientists are gathering in Austin this week to discuss the state of science in the country. High on the list of concerns for the American Association for the Advancement of Science at their annual meeting is the Trump administration’s antagonism to language used widely in the scientific community: “science-based” and “evidence-based.” Apparently, these words are so anathema that the current administration has banned CDC from using them on its websites and in agency directives.

When we informed the association that we were working on a piece regarding the bans on these terms, the organization’s press office offered a had a single word reply: “Yeah!” Susan Hockfield, the association’s new president, has said that “working together to clearly articulate the value and importance of scientific research and innovation is more than ever the imperative.”

TONI INGLIS: The CDC can’t use 7 terms on paper. Here’s what to expect.

Those in attendance will include: former Vice President Joe Biden, who will speak Sunday evening on advancements in cancer research; NASA Houston Johnson Space Center expert Kimberly Hambuchen, who well tell talk about NASA’s Bipedal Humanoid Caretaker Robot; and researchers like Dr. Patricia Berg of George Washington University, an AAAS fellow who discovered a protein activated in 80 percent of breast cancers and 70 percent of prostate cancers.

It makes a sort of twisted sense that an administration that came out of the gate touting their use of “alternative facts” regarding the crowd size at President Trump’s inauguration is now engaging in hostility against scientifically provable, objective reality. A clear pattern has emerged: “Evidence-based” and “science-based” facts are of no use to Trump or his agency heads.

The upcoming conference has several panels regarding issues such as “What Citizens Think About Science: Survey Data and Implications for Communicators,” “Understanding and Responding to Climate Change Denial,” and “Facts and Value in Public Policymaking.” It’s clear these scientists recognize the importance of communicating objective facts to the public. The thrust of the conference can be seen as an implicit rebuke to the current administration’s hostility to science.

Some alarming changes went into effect at the Center for Disease Control in December. In addition to “evidence-based” and “science-based”, senior staff was briefed on still more language that is “forbidden” for budget documents. They include medical terms like “fetus” and “transgender.”

HOW WE GOT HERE: CDC given list of ‘forbidden’ words for budget.

The Department of Health and Human Services has introduced language that demonstrates a shift from science and toward ideology as well. The EPA, Department of Energy, and Department of Transportation have seen language about climate change removed. The head of the EPA, Scott Pruitt, personally led removal of wording emphasizing human activity’s role in climate change, according to e-mails discovered by the Environment Defense Fund last month.

Apparently, the planet must just suffer through incredibly destructive droughts and wildfires in equatorial regions, staggering glacial melt at the poles, an increasing number of disruptive weather events such as last year’s hurricanes, and levels of carbon dioxide that contributed to making the five hottest years on record on earth occur since 2010, which in turn causes oceans to rise and crops to falter. Nonetheless, “climate change” has all but disappeared from the United States’ official view.

When medical language is prohibited in health agency documents, it detracts from the ability to care for people. When the United States is the only country in the world to pull out of the Paris Accord and our national agencies are instructed to turn their backs on evidence, it can only put America further behind. Far from making America great again, it puts us on a purposeful backslide in international relevance.

“Evidence” and “science” are not dirty words, despite the administration’s ban.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

Robert Weiner was a spokesman for the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Kyle Fleck is a policy analyst for Robert Weiner Associates.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Will automation kill our jobs?

A recent article in The Guardian dons the foreboding title “Robots will destroy our jobs — and we’re not ready for it.” The article claims, “For every job created by robotic automation, several more will be eliminated entirely. … This disruption will have a devastating impact on our workforce.” According to...
Herman: The words Nancy Pelosi has trouble saying
Herman: The words Nancy Pelosi has trouble saying

U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi dropped by the newspaper Monday and generously gave us more than an hour of her time to talk about the issues of the day, both legislative and political. She opened by noting it was Presidents Day, which indeed it was. About 40 minutes later, it struck me that Pelosi, in town as part of a Texas swing to rally...
Letters to the editor: Feb. 22, 2018
Letters to the editor: Feb. 22, 2018

We are long overdue for legislation on gun safety. We must require permits to purchase firearms, contingent on 1) completion of firearm training and education, and 2) passing a universal background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. We must give private sellers access to this system and require them to use it. And...
Facebook comments: Feb. 20, 2018
Facebook comments: Feb. 20, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Philip Jankowski, Austin became the first city in Texas to regulate sick leave. The Austin City Council voted early Friday to make paid sick leave a mandatory requirement for all nongovernment employers. It passed 9-2, with Council Members Ora Houston and Ellen Troxclair voting against it. The ordinance...
TWO VIEWS: Let’s use better tools to decide which inmates get bail
TWO VIEWS: Let’s use better tools to decide which inmates get bail

Criminal justice reform is a prominent issue in the public square, capturing the interest of both ends of the ideological spectrum, as well as celebrities, think tanks and even the White House. Propelling this issue forward, both nationally and in the Lone Star State, is a recognition that change is needed. Especially when it comes to jails. One of...
More Stories