You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Bresette: Include children when redrawing electoral districts


Do children count?

The U.S. Supreme Court will address this very question on Dec.8, when the justices hear oral arguments in the case Evenwel v. Abbott. This case from Texas challenges our long-standing practice of counting every person when drawing electoral districts. Today, almost all state and local jurisdictions in America draw districts based on total population. That way, elected leaders represent equal numbers of people in each district.

In this particular case, however, the plaintiffs want to require that Texas districts be drawn counting only the voting population, not the total population.

This requirement is problematic because it upends what representative democracy means in America.

First, counting only voters excludes a significant population, namely children under age 18. Children represent the largest group of nonvoters that would be affected, and areas with high numbers of children would see dramatically reduced representation. Though children can’t vote, they are indeed people, and have a vital stake in the affairs of our nation. For this reason, the Children’s Defense Fund of Texas, our national office and state affiliates filed an amicus brief in the case. In it, we urge the Supreme Court to dismiss this effort to undermine voting rights and representation and to ensure equal protection for those not yet old enough to vote.

Not only is this case a direct attack on the “one person, one vote” principle enshrined by the 14th Amendment, it is an affront to the fundamental democratic principle that elected officials represent all people in their jurisdiction, not just those who voted for them. Among those most in need of a voice are the 75 million children in this country. Texas alone has nearly 7 million residents younger than 18 — more than a quarter of our total population — and 96 percent are native-born residents.

Second, another problem with ignoring such a substantial share of the population when designing legislative districts is that, in Texas, and in many states, the child population is concentrated in certain areas. For example, there are significant variations in child population as a percentage of total population in Texas Senate districts, ranging from 23 percent in some rural areas to 30 percent and more in some cities, suburbs and in the Rio Grande Valley.

Excluding children would result in dramatic shifts in representation away from regions with higher child populations — areas that need as many voices as possible in the Capitol because they have the greatest need for adequate resources, programs and services. Two decades of research tells us that the status of children is directly linked to the level of public investment they receive. In Texas, a state that consistently ranks near the bottom in measures of child well-being, children’s concerns need more – not less – weight in state policy and budgeting decisions.

Third, excluding children is problematic because legislative redistricting plans are revised only once every 10 years. Consequently, significant numbers of residents who are underage at the time of redistricting will become eligible voters over the decade. Over time, this creates growing imbalances in how areas are represented. In Texas, roughly three million children between 9 and 17 years old will become voting age over a 10 year period.

This case is about our ability to have a legislature that represents all people equally — and the foreseeable, negative consequences of declaring that children “don’t count.” Both the State of Texas and the Obama administration defend the current, long-standing approach of counting everyone. Texas, for good reason, has chosen to define the “people” entitled to equal representation to include children. The Supreme Court should uphold its power to do so, reject this radical proposal, and reaffirm that children do indeed count and should be counted.

Patrick Bresette is executive director of the Children’s Defense Fund of Texas. Read the CDF amicus brief here.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Gail Collins: Trump stays buggy
Gail Collins: Trump stays buggy

Whatever Donald Trump has, it’s spreading. We’ve got a president who makes things up — and won’t retract when he’s cornered. This week press secretary Sean Spicer followed the leader. He picked up Trump’s wiretap story and added a new exciting detail: Not only had Barack Obama bugged Trump Tower, he might have used...
Krauthammer: American democracy is not so decadent after all
Krauthammer: American democracy is not so decadent after all

Under the dark gray cloud, amid the general gloom, allow me to offer a ray of sunshine. The last two months have brought a pleasant surprise: Turns out the much feared, much predicted withering of our democratic institutions has been grossly exaggerated. The system lives. Let me explain. Donald Trump’s triumph last year was based on a frontal...
Commentary: Our schools are broken; it’s time to demand change
Commentary: Our schools are broken; it’s time to demand change

Last year, the Texas Supreme Court called our state’s school funding system awful, inadequate and basically a mess – yet still ruled that it met some minimum standard for Texas students. When I asked one legislator to explain this, he said that only three or four people in Texas understood the school finance system — and he wasn&rsquo...
Commentary: Ride-hailing shenanigans at Legislature could produce harm
Commentary: Ride-hailing shenanigans at Legislature could produce harm

A great irony is transpiring at the Texas Legislature. Some conservative legislators are asking their colleagues to throw the principle of local control overboard while also weakening public safety laws. We refer of course to the great ride-hailing legislative scam. Proposed bills would cancel the authority of local governments to regulate Uber and...
Letters to the editor: March 24, 2017
Letters to the editor: March 24, 2017

Re: March 11 letter to the editor, “Free press critical to U.S.; Trump must be rebuked.” Those defending the media recently have gotten two things right: The free press is the watchdog of the government, and its protections and duty are explicitly granted in the U.S. Constitution. But when the press becomes derelict in this duty, who is...
More Stories