You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Austin voters can do something about congestion by voting for Prop. 1

We would be the first to admit that the $720 million “go big” transportation bond package on the Nov. 8 ballot is not perfect. But it is certainly good.

Proposition 1 aims to address Austin’s dreadful traffic congestion by upgrading major corridors, adding technological and engineering features to signals and roadways, and expanding public transit and pedestrian options so people have a variety of ways to reach their destinations. Such improvements are long overdue: In recent years, Austin’s traffic woes have been compared to congestion in Los Angeles and New York.

Lest voters allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good, they would be wise to vote for Proposition 1.

The city’s transportation network for some time has been in crisis, a condition caused primarily by Austin’s rapid growth, but also by its blinders. Too often, city leaders shut their eyes to traffic bottlenecks, collisions between cars and bicycles, public buses that backed up traffic as they stopped to pick up commuters, poorly synchronized traffic signals and pedestrians, including children, who have been forced to walk in streets to reach a bus stop, school or other destination because sidewalks aren’t available.

By most estimates, the bond package is affordable for taxpayers.


Austin Mayor Steve Adler, who crafted the bond package, says it will add $56 a year to the tax bill of a median-priced home of $250,000, a figure that is backed by the city finance department. When calculated five years into the future — when the full tax rate hits — that same city finance department says the figure could rise to $108 on a median-valued home, which by then would be worth $304,000. So it boils down to either about $5 a month or $9. (A tax calculator is available to assess the bond package’s impact on individual property taxes.)

We reject figures provided by bond opponents, such as Roger Falk with the Travis County Taxpayers Union, who said though city figures are wrong, “We don’t necessarily have the right number.”

Council Member Ora Houston, a vocal opponent of the bond package, does raise a legitimate point that must be addressed prior to moving forward with issuing bonds for road projects in the event Austin voters pass the bond package, as we are recommending.

Building roads and fixing infrastructure, particularly along East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/FM 969, must avoid displacing longtime residents in the area, as is happening in east-central Austin because of city policies that spurred rapid redevelopment in historically African-American and Latino communities. The city must take steps to protect vulnerable communities and remaining affordable neighborhoods that will be affected by road improvements. Setting off another land rush that pushes people out of their neighborhoods would be irresponsible, if not cruel.

East Martin Luther King Boulevard in Houston’s District 1 is among several corridors that would receive the lion’s share of bond funding: $482 million in all for improvements, including upgrades to traffic signals that allow them to be programmed in real time. That is a big advantage. Adler said, for instance, traffic signals could be adjusted to help traffic flow smoothly following University of Texas football games, then readjusted once congestion subsides. Improvements also include pullout lanes for buses, signalization to allow buses to get back into traffic, more turn bays at intersections, some bus priority lanes and other technology upgrades. Other corridors include North and South Lamar Boulevard, Burnet Road, East Riverside Drive, Airport Boulevard and Guadalupe Street.

The package will also include $137 million for “local mobility,” primarily in sidewalks, bikeways and trails. And there would be $101 million for “regional mobility” on larger streets and some Texas Department of Transportation highways, primarily in the western suburbs, including Loop 360, FM 2222, Lakewood Drive, Spicewood Springs Road, Anderson Mill Road and Parmer Lane.

Passing a bond at this time to fix Austin’s key corridors builds on improvements underway on MoPac Boulevard and Interstate 35, creating a mobility synergy that addresses getting people into town, then moving them around once they get here.

Though the bond package does not address all of the city’s traffic needs, it is the largest in the city’s history. An ultimate solution will cost much more, with estimates rising into the billions of dollars to fix every broken intersection, widen roadways, add turning lanes, and build sidewalks and bike lanes across the city. But the idea is to tackle some projects on that list and continue making progress in future years as the city’s tax base grows and other technological advances come to market.

While some have suggested that the bond be broken into three parts — which would allow voters to choose all, some or none of the provisions — we believe in the whole-package approach with regard to transportation and mobility. Bike paths and sidewalks have never had to stand on their own before voters, and fixing only roads will not be as effective in decreasing congestion as building a connective system that provides options for drivers as well as pedestrians to reach their destinations. Such a system ideally would maximize opportunities for public transit, so people could walk or bike to Capital Metro bus stops or rail stations instead of driving.

That is the kind of intervention Austin needs at this point. And it’s overdue.

The question is whether we will do something about our congestion on Nov. 8 or allow the problem to continue eroding our quality of life. The bond package is not perfect, but it is certainly good.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Are Illinois and Puerto Rico our future?

If Gov. Bruce Rauner and his legislature in Springfield do not put a budget together by today, the Land of Lincoln will be the first state in the Union to see its debt plunge into junk-bond status. Illinois has $14.5 billion in overdue bills, $130 billion in unfunded pension obligations, and no budget. “We can’t manage our money,&rdquo...
COMMENTARY: The big Republican lies about health care

To succeed in gutting health coverage for millions of Americans, Senate Republican leaders need to get a series of lies accepted as truth. Journalists and other neutral arbiters must resist the temptation to report these lies as just a point of view. A lie is a lie. Lie One: Democrats and progressives are unwilling to work with Republicans...
Opinion: Opioids, a mass killer we’re meeting with a shrug

About as many Americans are expected to die this year of drug overdoses as died in the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined. For more than 100 years, death rates have been dropping for Americans — but now, because of opioids, death rates are rising again. We as a nation are going backward, and drug overdoses are now the leading cause of...
Phillips: Austin ISD decisions need more transparency and independence
Phillips: Austin ISD decisions need more transparency and independence

Austin school trustees and Superintendent Paul Cruz repeatedly touted a bond package that would include only projects that were critical. Yet the $1 billion-plus package trustees approved Monday includes projects that weren’t deemed critical enough for a November ballot — even by the trustee’s hand-picked advisory board members. Several...
Letters to the editor: June 29, 2017
Letters to the editor: June 29, 2017

Re: June 26 article, “Fonda San Miguel chef shaped Austin’s food scene.” While house-hunting in Austin in 1981, my husband and I were directed to Fonda San Miguel for our first dinner in town. Throughout the years, its Sunday brunches became a favorite. Chef Miguel Ravago seemed to be always around. The passing of Chef Ravago brought...
More Stories