PolitiFact: Cruz can’t make us forget the shutdown he caused

With an end to the federal government shutdown, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, tried to argue that, contrary to popular belief, he was not the driving force behind the previous government shutdown in 2013.

Back in 2013, Cruz — then a junior member of the Senate’s minority party — had tried to end funding for the Affordable Care Act. He pushed for language to defund Obamacare in spending bills, which would have forced then-President Barack Obama to choose between keeping the government open and crippling his signature legislative achievement.

As the high-stakes legislative game played out, Obama and his fellow Democrats refused to agree to gut the law, and the Republicans, as a minority party, didn’t have the numbers to force their will. After a 16-day shutdown, lawmakers voted to fund both the government and the Affordable Care Act.

Cruz was widely identified at the time as the leader of the defunding effort. Most famously, Cruz spoke about defunding Obamacare on the Senate floor during a 21-hour speech, punctuated by “Green Eggs and Ham” as a bedtime story for his children.

Many in Cruz’s own party, even those sympathetic with his goals, blamed him for a tactical blunder. During the spending impasse, his Republican colleagues launched “a barrage of hostile questions” at a GOP-only lunch, questioning whether Cruz had thought through the endgame.

By the time Cruz was running for president in 2016, some Republicans were willing to criticize his approach publicly. Grover Norquist, an influential anti-tax activist, told The Washington Post in 2016 that Cruz’s shutdown plan was like a plotline in TV’s “South Park” in which a group of gnomes comes up with a nonsense plot to become rich. Josh Holmes, a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told the Post that Cruz’s approach was “like a toddler’s version of legislating.”

Leading up to the 2018 shutdown, Cruz’s role in the 2013 budget impasse received fresh media coverage, since he was now in the Senate majority. Would he be able to reconcile his past tactics with his current urgings not to shut down the government?

This came to a head during a Senate hallway exchange between Cruz and reporter Kasie Hunt that aired Monday on MSNBC.

“We should not be shutting the government down,” Cruz said. “I have consistently opposed shutdowns. In 2013, I said we shouldn’t shut the government down. Indeed, I went to the Senate floor repeatedly asking unanimous consent to reopen the government.”

Hunt: “Sir, you stood in the way of that.”

Cruz: “That’s factually incorrect. It’s a wonderful media narrative, but only one thing causes a shutdown: when you have senators vote to deny cloture on a funding bill. And when that bill comes up, you have a vote. A yes means fund the government; a no means don’t fund the government.”

Even if you accept Cruz’s line of thinking, his comments offered a very specific definition of determining whether a lawmaker had “consistently opposed shutdowns.”

So did Cruz ever “vote to deny cloture on a funding bill”?

He did.

It came on the legislation to end the 16-day shutdown — a bill that didn’t include the Obamacare defunding language that he had been seeking. If this spending bill didn’t pass, the government wouldn’t be funded and would have to remain closed. As it happened, the bill passed by a large bipartisan majority, but Cruz was one of 16 senators to vote against cloture. He was also one of 18 to vote against the bill itself.

By doing the “one thing” that he himself said defines causing a shutdown, Cruz didn’t “consistently oppose shutdowns.”

“When he knew everyone else would vote to end the shutdown, he voted against funding the government,” said Josh Ryan, a Utah State University political scientist.

Cruz campaign spokeswoman Catherine Frazier told PolitiFact that his “goal was to defund Obamacare, not shut down the government, and that is the point he was making today. He voted several times and fought in the face of (Democratic) opposition to fund vital government services — including the military, veterans benefits, the National Guard, and National Health Institute — while working to defund Obamacare before it went into effect, at which point he knew it would be markedly more difficult to undo. Sen. Cruz voted against cloture on the final bill because it still funded Obamacare, and he was committed to continuing the debate to defund it, while supporting bills to fund the other functions of government not impacted by Obamacare.”

Our ruling:

Cruz said, “I have consistently opposed shutdowns.” Debunking this assertion doesn’t even require leveraging the many Republican statements criticizing Cruz’s legislative tactics for prompting the 2013 government shutdown. It only requires using the standard Cruz laid out in the same interview — that “only one thing causes a shutdown: when you have senators vote to deny cloture on a funding bill.”

Cruz did that very thing in 2013, when he was one of 16 senators to vote against cloture for the spending bill that would go on to end the shutdown. He was also one of 18 senators to vote against the bill itself.

We rate his statement Pants on Fire!

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

Trump fumes about Russia investigation as nation mourns
Trump fumes about Russia investigation as nation mourns

As the nation mourned, President Donald Trump kept largely silent about the Florida school shooting victims and the escalating gun control debate, instead raging at the FBI for what he perceived to be a fixation on the Russia investigation at the cost of failing to deter the attack. From the privacy of Mar-a-Lago, Trump vented about the investigation...
How Russian trolls tried to fool Texans
How Russian trolls tried to fool Texans

They were politically active Americans scattered around the country, dedicating their spare time to the 2016 presidential campaign or various causes. And the seeming fellow activists who called them to rallies via Facebook, or joined in the free-for-all on Twitter, appeared unremarkable. Except that their English sometimes seemed a little odd. &ldquo...
Why Parkland students have emerged as a powerful political voice
Why Parkland students have emerged as a powerful political voice

The boldest voices to emerge in the wake of last week's mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. have been unexpected ones. Surviving students at the school quickly spoke out on social media and to news cameras both about the incident and, more broadly, about political leadership which they saw as having let them...
Growth, property taxes top issues in Hays Commissioners Court races

The makeup of the Hays County Commissioners Court has the potential to see big changes in 2018, with four of five seats up for election. County Judge Bert Cobb, who took a leave of absence last summer to begin treatment for leukemia, is not seeking a third term. Republican Will Conley stepped down as commissioner of Precinct 3 to run for county judge...
Contentious 331st District race pits longtime judge against attorney
Contentious 331st District race pits longtime judge against attorney

The only contested judicial race in Travis County’s criminal district courts has gotten contentious, with challenger Chantal Eldridge saying taxpayers have been underserved by the incumbent while Eldridge faces questions of her own about the registered sex offender she employs in her law firm and intends to bring on as a judicial aide if she...
More Stories