Theories abound on courthouse defeat


On the 15th floor of a Congress Avenue office building, about 40 lawyers, political consultants and elected officials clutched drinks in one hand and nervously checked their phones with the other as results streamed in from Travis County’s $287 million bond election for a new civil courthouse to be built seven blocks away.

Some at Tuesday night’s party, hosted by the Austin Bar Association, had spent hundreds of hours, contributed thousands of dollars or put significant political capital on the line for the project. For a while, things were looking good for them: A steady stream of upward-trending results had erased a deficit from early voting.

But then a late surge of “no” votes put its passage out of reach. Campaign workers cried and hugged, Lakeway and Pflugerville were cursed for their presumed opposition to the project, and County Judge Sarah Eckhardt gave a passionate speech about the need for greater voter turnout and appreciation for justice administration.

Theories as to why the bonds failed are myriad and multiplying: State constitutional amendments and suburban races drew out conservative voters; Austin’s affordability crisis has made it impossible to pass large bond projects; the severe weather late last week distracted voters targeted by the pro-courthouse campaign; the price tag was simply too high for one building.

For Austin City Council Member Don Zimmerman, who as a city official had nothing to do with the project but led the charge against it, the reason the bonds failed had everything to do with the people at the bar association party.

“The corporate downtown special-interest lobby spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on this,” said Zimmerman, whose campaign with the Travis County Taxpayers Union barely spent any money. “I think a lot of people heard that and said, ‘Well why are hundreds of thousands of dollars being spent if it’s such a good idea?’”

After 15 years of planning, the courthouse bonds lost by about 1,000 votes out of 73,000, a margin of less than 2 percentage points. The defeat follows Austin-area voters’ decision last year to torpedo a massive road-and-rail bond package and, for the first time, a school bond package, prompting questions about whether affordability concerns are becoming a force in local politics.

The notion doesn’t sit well with Eckhardt.

“My gosh, what do you say about that? Does this mean that you just stop building civic infrastructure or do you push ahead?” Eckhardt said.

It was a rhetorical question, because Eckhardt had already made up her mind that the county should move forward with a new version of the courthouse — an enormous political risk given Tuesday’s result. “We need this badly enough for me to take the hit. Sometimes you’ve just got to be brave,” she said.

State law prohibits the county from issuing debt on projects that voters reject for three years after the election. Eckhardt said the county cannot wait that long for a new downtown courthouse and will have to come up a way to build it without borrowing, possibly by partnering with a private developer in a deal that she said will cost taxpayers more in the long run.

Tuesday’s 11.6 percent turnout was typically low for an off-year election with no high-profile items on the ballot. A majority of voters in Austin supported the project, but the suburban and rural parts of the county voted overwhelmingly against it.

Veteran political consultant David Butts, who worked on the bar association-funded campaign for the bonds, said the city-versus-county voting pattern was neither surprising nor the reason the bonds failed.

The real reason, he said, is that the traditionally liberal city voters didn’t vote for the bonds by significant enough margins to overcome the expected deficit in the county. In other words, the problem was a lack of support in Democratic areas, not a Republican show of force.

“Lakeway gave us a high enough … percentage that we should have won, but then when you look at the central city and you see where the vote sort of fell off — Barton Hills, Allandale, Zilker, Rosedale to an extent — these are heavily Democratic, even on today’s housing prices, and there had to be some sort of phenomenon going on. We just didn’t quite get the percentages that we needed,” he said.

Butts said the opposition to the courthouse was galvanized by Zimmerman, who held a news event outside City Hall during early voting calling for the bonds to be defeated so the project could be moved to East Austin. The moment can be seen as an indirect consequence of the City Council’s switch this year from at-large seats to geographic districts, which allowed conservatives like Zimmerman to win in right-leaning areas when they almost certainly couldn’t citywide.

“It’s not that he didn’t have these press conferences before on other issues, but he didn’t have the position,” said Butts, who opposed the switch to geographic districts.

Pete McRae, a lobbyist and public affairs consultant, said the pro-bond campaign was “fighting against the tide” from the start because of the timing of the election, with nothing else on the ballot in many places besides seven state constitutional amendments that provided additional property tax relief and enshrined the right to hunt and fish.

“It was a bad idea to put it on a November odd-year election,” he said. “It was just kind of campaign 101 you don’t put this type of thing on a ballot when those type of voters turn out.”

Bill Oakey, an affordability advocate and blogger who hammered the county on the cost of the courthouse when it was being planned, said it was a “sad day for Travis County” because a new courthouse is needed and the county could have had one — if it had taken more seriously his suggestion to ensure the project was a “national model for cost-effectiveness and efficiency.”

“The affordability concerns of the people are so strong that they are voting reflexively to protect themselves from increases in taxes,” he said.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Local

Police standoff Monday shuts down I-35 in New Braunfels, officials say 
Police standoff Monday shuts down I-35 in New Braunfels, officials say 

Both the north and southbound lanes of Interstate 35 near Schwab Road have been closed while New Braunfels police is engaged in standoff, causing major delays in the area, officials said Monday night.  The scene is still active, police said. No other details were immediately available.
Suspect in police chase, officer-involved shooting killed, police chief says 
Suspect in police chase, officer-involved shooting killed, police chief says 

11:30 p.m. update: A man who led officers on a police chase that ended in an officer-involved shooting was pronounced dead at the scene, Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said Monday night.  Manley said the incident started at about 5:30 p.m. and took place across three different locations.  According to the preliminary investigation...
Manor residents allowed to return home after gas leak, officials say 
Manor residents allowed to return home after gas leak, officials say 

8:45 p.m. update: Residents who were evacuated after a gas leak at the 700 block of North Bastrop Street can now return to their homes, city officials said Monday night.  Officials gave the all clear at about 8:30 p.m. Utility technicians are currently at the location working on repairs, officials said.  Earlier: Manor police and firefighters...
Poll: George P. Bush and Sid Miller ahead but could face runoffs
Poll: George P. Bush and Sid Miller ahead but could face runoffs

Land Commissioner George P. Bush and Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller are both facing fluid races heading into the March 6 Republican primary, raising the possibility of being forced into runoff elections, according to the results of a University of Texas/Texas Tribune poll released Monday. While poll results showed that Bush and Miller had more...
Four people vying for two seats on the Hutto City Council
Four people vying for two seats on the Hutto City Council

Four people have filed to run for two places on the Hutto City Council in the May election. Incumbent Thomas Hines, a firefighter, is seeking re-election for place 2 in the council. He’s running against Gay McMillan, an artist and writer. Two people are also running for the place 5 seat currently occupied by Lucio Valdez, who is not seeking re-election...
More Stories