Ruling rejects Austin’s old fundraising window. What about the new one?


Highlights

Former Council Member Don Zimmerman wins partial victory against Austin City Council’s fundraising rules.

Ruling against city’s old 6-month limit should also apply to its new 12-month one, Zimmerman’s lawyer says.

Federal appeals court does uphold campaign contribution limit of $350 per donor in an election cycle.

Former City Council Member Don Zimmerman’s mixed victory in his fight against Austin campaign finance rules will stand, an appeals court ruled Thursday.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court’s ruling from 2016 that struck down two provisions of Austin’s campaign finance rules and left two others in place. Most notably, the decision held that Austin could not justify a blackout period that prohibited candidates from fundraising until a certain period of time before an election.

Previously, Austin’s rules disallowed any fundraising earlier than six months before an election day. After the lower court overturned that in July 2016, City Council members passed a new ordinance allowing fundraising only within one year before an election.

BACKGROUND: ‘Two to go,’ Zimmerman says on campaign rules

In its ruling, the appellate court noted that Austin conducts business year-round and does not change its consideration of votes based on when elections are, so candidates are no more susceptible to bribes six months before an election than they are a year or two before.

“Austin needed to establish that even if a $350 contribution near the time of an election is not likely to lead to actual corruption or its appearance, the same contribution made at another time is,” the court wrote.

Zimmerman’s attorney, Jerad Najvar, said the court’s arguments clearly apply to the new one-year window the council approved in October, just as the six-month window it struck down. Najvar won a similar case against Houston that overturned a nine-month fundraising window there.

“The new one-year fundraising window (in Austin) is just as unconstitutional as the six-month window, and this ruling just reinforces that,” he said. “The sooner Austin learns the lesson of how the First Amendment applies to these rules, the better for taxpayers.”

Last August, the council put an additional $75,000 toward the legal bills on the case, bringing the total tab to $255,000.

‘UNPRECEDENTED’: Zimmerman sues Austin over campaign finance rules

It’s unclear whether anyone in Austin will challenge the new time period. Previously, Council Member Leslie Pool said she hoped a longer fundraising window would be less susceptible to lawsuits.

“A year is … twice as long,” she said in October. “It’s unseemly for people to be raising money when they’re also passing judgments on issues that have very real consequences to the community.”

The appeals court also sided with Zimmerman over a “dissolution requirement” that said elected officials could not use campaign money for future races, rejecting Austin’s argument that Zimmerman lacked standing to challenge it, and finding that use of the money for campaigns amounted to freedom of speech.

The court sided with the city of Austin in upholding a campaign contribution limit of $350 per donor in an election cycle and a rule that a candidate cannot raise more than $36,000 total from donors who live outside of Austin’s city limits.

Najvar plans to continue fighting on those fronts. Zimmerman intends to file a motion for the entire 5th Circuit to rehear the case, he said.

INTERACTIVE TIMELINE: Don Zimmerman’s political career

On the $350-per-donor limit, the court noted that the Supreme Court has held that contribution limits are different than expenditure limits — and less of a burden on free speech.

“We decline Zimmerman’s invitation to blur the line that the Supreme Court has drawn,” the court wrote.

It added that the limit was on par with others that have been upheld—such as Missouri’s $275 contribution limit in 2002 for candidates for any office representing fewer than 100,000 people. It also took into account testimony from Zimmerman’s former council colleagues, and it shot down arguments that the policy favored incumbents.

“Zimmerman himself, an incumbent, was defeated when he ran for re-election in 2016,” the court wrote.

It agreed with the lower court ruling that Zimmerman did not have standing to challenge a maximum total of $36,000 to be raised from outside the district, because he had raised nowhere near that much.

Zimmerman told the court in a signed declaration that, if he could have raised more, he would have paid $5,000 to purchase a list of conservative donors from outside his area. But the court wasn’t persuaded that was enough of an injury to give Zimmerman standing.

ALSO READ: This Don Zimmerman lawsuit won’t make it to court (and he’s OK with that)



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Local

FORECAST: Cold front sinks temps into 40s ahead of storms; high of 55 in Austin
FORECAST: Cold front sinks temps into 40s ahead of storms; high of 55 in Austin

Wednesday forecast for Austin: An overnight cold front has caused a severe drop in morning temperatures and will usher in a round of storms that could produce as much as three-quarters of an inch of rain, the National Weather Service says. Forecasters say isolated to widely scattered showers will move north-northeast across the Hill Country and along...
Fifth UT-area Subway robbery reported in two months
Fifth UT-area Subway robbery reported in two months

An armed robbery occurred Tuesday night at a Subway fast food restaurant on San Antonio Street near West 24th Street, University of Texas police said. At 10 p.m., police said they were looking for the robber, who witnesses described as a man wearing baggy clothing, who might be in his mid-30s.  This is the the fifth Subway to be robbed in...
Manchaca vs. Menchaca: Step closer to renaming South Austin road
Manchaca vs. Menchaca: Step closer to renaming South Austin road

It’s always been a head-scratcher for outsiders — Austinites pronouncing Manchaca Road as “MAN-shack.” But after decades of confusion, will Austin finally get it right? After six years and more than $24,000 raised, retired Judge Bob Perkins certainly hopes so. Since 2011, he’s been a champion for Texas Revolutionary captain...
Mayor Adler’s State of City address covers taxes, CodeNext and Russia
Mayor Adler’s State of City address covers taxes, CodeNext and Russia

Austin Mayor Steve Adler delivered Tuesday a State of the City address that blamed the state for continual rises in property tax bills, touted the numerous amount of road projects ahead that will — hopefully — improve traffic and vowed to make Austin a global leader. In an address that checked in at about 42 minutes, Adler hit on many of...
Abbott picks former San Angelo mayor for transportation board
Abbott picks former San Angelo mayor for transportation board

The suddenly short-handed Texas Transportation Commission Tuesday gained a new member, business investor, rancher and former San Angelo Mayor Alvin New. New, a life-long West Texan who was born in Brownfield and has lived in or near San Angelo since 1981, will replace Tryon Lewis of Odessa. Lewis, who until September had been chairman of the five-member...
More Stories