Analysis shows Austin urban rail votes closely tied to proposed route

How Austinites stood on the city’s defeated rail-and-roads proposal had a lot to do with where they lie down at night, based on a review of Tuesday’s precinct-by-precinct results.

The closer people live to the proposed route of the 9.5-mile light rail line, the more likely they were to vote yes Tuesday. And in a city with more than 500 square miles, a great many people’s homes are a great distance away from what would have been a 30-foot-wide sliver of rail.

The $1 billion measure got a majority of the votes in just 49 of the city’s 228 voting precincts, losing citywide 57 percent to 43 percent and throwing serious doubt on the future of rail in Central Texas. Light rail, which fell about 2,000 votes short in a Capital Metro election 14 years ago, this time lost by 27,289 votes.

“Southwest Austin, Southeast Austin, Northwest Austin just said, ‘You gotta be kidding,’” said Peck Young, an Austin political consultant for decades and now an Austin Community College professor. “Because for those people, their taxes were going up and they were as far away from that train as you could possibly get.”

In Precinct 304 in Circle C Ranch, for instance, just 28 percent of the 2,096 people who voted said yes to the measure, even though it also had a $400 million roads package that would have included widening nearby RM 1826. Under the proposition, the city would have borrowed $600 million to supply most of the local share of the line’s estimated $1.4 billion cost.

But in Precinct 429 along East Riverside Drive, which would have had light rail cutting through it from one end to the other, two thirds of the 1,437 voters approved of the proposition. The other six precincts with more than 65 percent in favor of rail were either along the rail line within a mile or two.

Conversely, with only a handful of exceptions, the precincts north of U.S. 183, west of MoPac Boulevard (Loop 1) and south of Ben White Boulevard disdained the proposal, many of them by 2-1 ratios or greater. The proposition also failed in East and Southeast Austin precincts beyond the city’s core.

To former Capital Metro board member John Langmore, who made a number of appearances at forums in favor of rail during the campaign, that geographic tie-in — insufficient for passage as it turned out to be — is actually an argument for continuing to pursue rail in Austin.

“It’s not an indictment of rail, it’s an endorsement of rail,” Langmore said. “The direct beneficiaries of it totally get it, in large numbers.”

As for those nowhere near the proposed line, Langmore called it “completely logical” that they voted no.

“Those people in Southwest and Northwest — understandably, by the way — looked at this and said, ‘There is nothing in it for me,’” he said, other than a steep property tax increase.

Langmore, while acknowledging that the city’s political class might not have the motivation to do so anytime soon, said a similar if not identical rail route should be brought back to voters and again be packaged with road spending. But the proposed road projects, he said, need to be tactically spread out around the area.

“You have to give them something,” Langmore said.

Young, who in his time ran numerous bond campaigns, said packaging rail and roads in one up-or-down proposition was a mistake.

“The voters actually appreciate the opportunity to choose,” he said. “And very often the fact that you offered them a choice makes them give you all of them. All or nothing? The answer is nothing.”

Austin attorney Pete Winstead, who formerly chaired the state’s tollway authority and describes himself as a “road warrior,” worked vigorously for the city proposition. Even so, he said Wednesday that the balance of the proposal was off. In an area plagued by highway and city street congestion, putting 60 percent of the proposed $1 billion toward something few would use was poor strategy, he said.

In any case, Winstead said he was worried about where this leaves Austin’s transportation future, and its economy.

“My concern is that it really shuts everything down for five to eight years,” Winstead said. “The congestion is just going to get worse. I’m getting a lot of feedback from companies that ‘if we had known Austin was like this, we wouldn’t have come here.’”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Local

Pennsylvania man accused of urinating on toys on store shelf
Pennsylvania man accused of urinating on toys on store shelf

A Pennsylvania man is accused of urinating on toys and other items in a store.  Police said David Pacoe, 74, was captured on surveillance video urinating on a shelf inside Playthings, Etc. in Butler on Nov. 2.  “It's not very nice at all and it's a toy store. You shouldn't have to worry about having security and guards or...
Ohio woman burned by coffee in break room spat
Ohio woman burned by coffee in break room spat

An Ohio woman suffered “significant burns” when another woman threw a cup of hot coffee on her in a break room at the YWCA, according to a Dayton Police report.  Officers and a medic were dispatched to the YWCA in Dayton at 5:25 p.m. Thursday on a report of an aggravated assault.  The two women involved in the altercation...
Thanksgiving forecast: Wear hoodies in Austin, parkas in northern U.S.
Thanksgiving forecast: Wear hoodies in Austin, parkas in northern U.S.

If you’re gearing up for that annual backyard family football game on Thanksgiving, you won’t have to worry about rain, though you might want to bring a hoodie. But while we’re not likely to face any serious weather-related problems in Central Texas, those heading out to see loved ones this holiday week should be prepared for snow...
PolitiFact: Texas doesn’t have gun checks, but feds do
PolitiFact: Texas doesn’t have gun checks, but feds do

Actress Alyssa Milano drew attention to gun background checks after the Nov. 5 shooting at a Sutherland Springs church left 26 people dead. “There are no background checks on long guns (AR15s) in Texas,” Milano tweeted, crediting for the information Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, an organization seeking stronger gun laws...
How your water use now could cost (or save) you all year
How your water use now could cost (or save) you all year

If you’ve ever looked at the wastewater charge on your utility bill and wondered how Austin Water authorities know how much you send down the drain … well, they don’t. At least not exactly. They estimate. They come up with a figure based on your water use from mid-November through mid-March. They assume you’re probably not...
More Stories