PolitiFact: Group wrongly understates county bond impact


Proponents of Travis County transportation and parks bond proposals on the November ballot made an enticing pitch to older homeowners in a mailer, telling them that their taxes are frozen and they won’t pay more if the bonds pass.

Travis Forward, a pro-bonds PAC, said in the mailer: “The Travis County propositions will not raise your taxes! If you are 65 or older, your property taxes are frozen.”

Readers asked us to check if the propositions won’t raise their taxes and whether property taxes are frozen for homeowners 65 or older. We put the mailer’s claim to the Texas Truth-O-Meter.

The “freeze” claim is inaccurate, Travis County officials quickly said to our inquiries, and it’s inaccurate to say the propositions won’t cost taxpayers anything extra.

Travis County Judge Sarah Eckhardt, who voted with colleagues to place the two bond propositions on the ballot before helping to kick off the privately funded Travis Forward campaign, speculated that consultants behind the mailer assumed the county, like the Austin school district, provides tax freezes to homesteading homeowners 65 or older.

“No doubt, this is inaccurate,” Eckhardt said told us. “To the extent I am responsible, I fall on my sword.”

Marya Crigler, chief appraiser of the Travis Central Appraisal District, noted that by state law, every Texas school district must set a ceiling on how much homeowners 65 or older pay. Counties and other governmental jurisdictions have the local option of setting such ceilings, Crigler advised.

Mykle Tomlinson, Travis Forward’s campaign manager, told us the errors occurred in mailers targeting older residents because consultants whom he did not identify misunderstood the difference between a homestead tax exemption and a tax freeze.

After our inquiry, Tomlinson said the group would follow up by sending postcards within a day or so to the 12,295 households that received the mailer.

At our request, Tomlinson emailed us a copy of the follow-up postcard which says on its front: “We were wrong and we’re sorry!”

The back of the postcard is headlined: “Setting the record straight.” Next comes text saying: “The mailer we sent to your home last week wrongly claimed that, like school district taxes, senior homeowners’ county taxes are frozen under state law.”

The back also says: “State law does not require a county tax freeze for seniors. The mailer we sent to your home last week was inaccurate, and we’re sorry. Please help us set the record straight by sharing this with your friends and neighbors.”

Bruce Elfant, Travis County’s tax assessor-collector, told us that if the county propositions win approval, homeowners will pay more in county taxes.

According to the county, the owner of a home at the 2017 average taxable property value of $305,000 can expect to pay no more than $24 a year for 20 years should voters approve Proposition A, to spend $93.4 million on road, sidewalk, bike and other transportation-related projects, and Proposition B, devoting nearly $91.5 million to parks and land conservation projects.

A county web page enables anyone to input any taxable property value — for homeowners, meaning the value, less exemptions including the county’s 20 percent homestead exemption — and see what the county estimates as the proposed bonds’ future annual costs to the property owner.

Although the county has no tax freeze for older residents, it does give them an additional homestead exemption up to $80,000 on the assessed value of their home. That is, county taxes accrue on the property’s taxable assessed value above $80,000 for those 65 and older.

Our ruling:

Travis Forward said in a mailer: “The Travis County propositions will not raise your taxes! If you are 65 or older, your property taxes are frozen.”

Neither claim holds up. We rate this two-part, to-be-retracted claim False.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Frustration mounts as city says there’s no explanation for water spikes
Frustration mounts as city says there’s no explanation for water spikes

As soon as he saw his September water bill, O.T. Greer knew something was wrong. In the 44 years he’s lived at his house on Aspen Street in North Austin, he’d never seen a water spike like the one this fall when his bill jumped from $22 to $215 in a month. Greer and his neighbors pride themselves on water conservation. His yard is xeriscaped...
Johnson says Senate tax bill would hurt small businesses (like his own)
Johnson says Senate tax bill would hurt small businesses (like his own)

Here's what Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., the first Republican to oppose the Senate tax bill, doesn't like about the measure: It would slash tax rates for conventional corporations and give a much smaller tax cut to firms like the four in which he has millions of dollars in investments.  Johnson's office says he does not support the Senate bill because...
The curious journey of Carter Page, the former Trump adviser who can’t stay out of the spotlight
The curious journey of Carter Page, the former Trump adviser who can’t stay out of the spotlight

Carter Page, PhD, is texting us in big paragraphs, from somewhere in New York, about his upended life.  "It's sort of like an extended plebe year ..." he writes.  (At Page's alma mater, the U.S. Naval Academy, first-year plebes endure a humbling boot-camp-style orientation.)  "... bringing the humiliation to a national...
Sen. Al Franken championed a Minnesota rape survivor’s bill. Now she wants a new sponsor.
Sen. Al Franken championed a Minnesota rape survivor’s bill. Now she wants a new sponsor.

It was on a November evening in 2014, after a tailgate party on her University of Minnesota campus, that Abby Honold was brutally raped by a fellow student. Despite going to the hospital in an ambulance with bruises and bite marks, despite reporting everything to police, it would take more than a year for Honold to find justice.  In August 2016...
Analysis shows tax bill would increase the cost of college by $71 billion over a decade
Analysis shows tax bill would increase the cost of college by $71 billion over a decade

The repeal or revision of higher education tax benefits in the House Republican bill would cost students and families more than $71 billion over the next decade, according to an official analysis by Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation.  In a letter obtained by The Washington Post, the committee provides specific individual scores of the education...
More Stories