Party chair thwarts Democrats’ push for Rep. Dawnna Dukes to resign


Highlights

Several party members outlined concerns at the county party’s monthly executive committee meeting.

Local party Chairman Vincent Harding said it’s against party’s standards to discard an elected official.

Travis County Democrats got into a heated debate Wednesday evening over requests by some to push for the resignation of embattled state Rep. Dawnna Dukes.

Several party members who serve in Dukes’ 46th district outlined concerns at the party’s monthly executive committee meeting, arguing the lawmaker is unfit to continue in her elected capacity because she ignores messages, was absent for about two-thirds of committee hearings at the recent legislative session and was the only House member who didn’t vote on the state budget.

Yet local Democratic Party Chairman Vincent Harding said it’s against the party’s standards to discard an elected official, and he rejected a motion that would have let party leaders vote on whether to continue to support Dukes, who also faces 13 felony counts in a corruption case in state District Court.

RELATED: How Dawnna Dukes is delaying her corruption case

“I’m asking you to trust me as chair, … it would do irreparable harm to the party,” Harding said, according to a recording obtained by the American-Statesman of the meeting at Scholz Garten.

An unidentified precinct chair fired back at Harding, “Inaction and absence have damaged this party’s reputation!”

Another hollered, “What would it take?”

The hope among Dukes’ detractors is that stripping her of party support would encourage her to resign and not seek re-election. Dukes, who is in her 11th term, hasn’t declared publicly if she intends to run in the March primary.

Daniel Segura-Kelly told the Statesman he is among 16 precinct chairs in the 46th district who are in favor of seeking Dukes’ resignation. Three others want her to stay. Three haven’t expressed their opinion.

He said the issue will be raised once more on June 28 when — unlike at Wednesday’s meeting — a parliamentarian will be in attendance to determine the fairness of Harding’s ruling.

Dukes, who wasn’t at the meeting, didn’t respond to a message for comment Thursday.

TEXAS POLITICS DELIVERED EVERY DAY: Sign up for our Texas Politics email

Meantime, another precinct chair, Roy Woody, told the newspaper a forum will take place sometime this month to hear from residents in Dukes’ district about her representation of them.

Harding, in a conversation with the Statesman, mentioned repeatedly he wasn’t defending Dukes at the meeting, but that he wanted to avoid setting a precedent by having the party ask an elected official to resign. He noted that Democrats stood by former District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg after she pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated in 2013.

Harding also pointed out Dukes’ race, African-American, as reason to not have her ousted, presumably because it could incite a backlash from others.

“I’ll just go out there and say it,” Harding, who also is African-American, told party members. “I do not think it would be wise for the Democratic Party to ask an elected African-American official to resign. Not one current African-American elected official has called for (her to resign). Not one former African-American elected official has called for her to resign.”

As the debate came to a close after 10 to 15 minutes, sergeant-at-arms Donna Beth McCormick intervened and admonished Dukes’ detractors to “get your act together” and consider filing an ethics complaint against her.

“We have to see what’s going to happen at the special (legislative) session, if she shows up, and if she’s going to retire,” McCormick said.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it
Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it

Six years ago, a police officer in this city in eastern Washington was convicted of beating a disabled man to death and trying to cover it up. After other alarming episodes involving Spokane officers came to light, the city asked federal officials to suggest changes to the Police Department as part of an Obama-era policing program.  Ever since...
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first

Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve chairwoman, made a relaxed appearance at New York University on Tuesday night, answering questions about her life in economics and her time at the Fed one day after she announced plans to leave the central bank next year.  Yellen said nothing new about the Fed’s policy plans for the coming months, leaving...
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military

A second federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s proposed ban on transgender troops Tuesday, saying President Donald Trump’s announcement of the ban in a series of tweets this summer was “capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified.”  In a preliminary injunction, Judge Marvin J. Garbis of the U.S. District Court for...
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality

For you and me, the Federal Communications Commission’s plan to repeal net neutrality rules can be boiled down to two questions: What might happen? And whom do you trust?  Here’s our guide for internet users looking for answers.    The net neutrality rules were passed in 2015 during the Obama administration when Democrats...
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.

It began with a familiar pledge: President Donald Trump’s audience, he promised, was going to be very proud of him.  “Hi, Drumstick,” Trump called out Tuesday, preparing to exercise his least controversial executive authority. “Oh, Drumstick, I think, is going to be very happy.”  It ended with characteristic...
More Stories