You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Ignored zoning order planted the seeds for the Grove legal battle

Years before anyone envisioned the Grove, a developer pitched plans for more than two dozen townhomes and condominiums along Exposition Boulevard.

The neighbors furiously objected, and the developer eventually yanked the plans for that 2-acre slice of land that once belonged to the Austin State School.

But along the way, the City Council discovered that neighbors of unzoned tracts like that — typically owned at one point by the county or the state — might not have standing to challenge a zoning case. To make sure that legal quirk didn’t surface again, then-Council Member Mike Martinez proposed a resolution that passed in 2008 ordering the city staff to begin the process of zoning those lands.

It never happened.

“I think that resolution was purposefully ignored,” Martinez told the American-Statesman last week. “Staff didn’t want anything to do with it. So here we are eight years after, and we’re faced with the same situation.”

This time, the stakes are much higher.

NEWS STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX: Click here to get our Morning Headlines email

At 75 unzoned acres, the Grove at Shoal Creek is more than 30 times the size of the failed Exposition Boulevard effort, and many neighbors are concerned about the nearly 20,000 extra daily car trips the project is expected to bring. Developer ARG Bull Creek Ltd. wants to build 2.4 million square feet of office, retail and residential space on the largely empty land formerly owned by the Texas Department of Transportation.

The law usually works like this: If more than 20 percent of the landowners who live within 200 feet of the property sign a protest petition, any change to the zoning requires the support of three-quarters of the City Council.

In this case, the Grove’s opponents got 28.68 percent of the project’s neighbors to sign the petition. However, citing a decades-old North Texas court case, the city rejected the petition, arguing that the provision applies only when land is being rezoned, not zoned for the first time.

The residents opposing the project filed suit in April in Travis County district court to challenge the city’s decision.

“Had staff followed up and done what they were told to by the council, the citizens around the Grove would not be in this position,” Martinez said.

“There was evidently no follow-up,” said former Mayor Lee Leffingwell, who as a then-council member co-sponsored the 2008 resolution. “I guess it got lost in the process somewhere.”

A City Hall spokesman declined to comment last week, citing the ongoing litigation. A preliminary hearing to rule on a motion for summary judgment is scheduled for Aug. 1, with a trial potentially beginning by Aug. 15. The City Council is expected to consider the project Aug. 11, though any final decision might be delayed by the legal wrangling.

Debate over size continues

The size and scope of the project have left many who live near it afraid of the traffic it will bring and how it will mesh with their neighborhoods. Those concerns have exhibited themselves in two quantifiable ways: fights over the amount of traffic the Grove will generate and the amount of park space it includes.

Under the current plans, commercial and office space would make up about 360,000 square feet, accounting for about 15 percent of the project. The bulk of the space would go toward building some 1,700 housing units, including 600 for independent senior living.

“We’re not opposed to the whole project; in fact, we welcome all the affordable and middle-income housing we can get over there,” said Sara Speights, president of the Bull Creek Road Coalition. “What we’re opposed to is the huge commercial development that’s taking over half the land.”

Speights’ group has been pushing developer ARG to scale back its commercial and office space to increase the project’s parkland, in part to cut the amount of traffic the Grove would bring to nearby streets.

The developers argue that their planned street improvements will be more than sufficient to handle the surge in traffic.

“They’re willing to support the square-footages with some traffic considerations, if we can provide more parkland. The problem is we can’t provide the amount of parkland they’re asking for,” said Garrett Martin, ARG’s manager. “It really is a discussion on degree, not on concept.”

The city’s Environmental Commission narrowly opposed the developer’s plan, registering its discontent even though the advisory board could not block it. The city’s Zoning and Platting Commission gave its blessing to the plan late Thursday night on a narrow 6-4 vote, including recommendations to bolster the density of housing in the project by adding 250,000 square feet of residential units and prohibiting single-family homes on several parts of the tract. The panel also urged the developer to work on a plan to reduce car trips to the site.

Divided by district

The bitter and long-running battle over the Grove has spilled over into related policy fights on the City Council and in two council races.

The proposed project would sit on the southern side of 45th Street, in the southern tip of the largely suburban District 10, which is represented by Council Member Sheri Gallo, who is being challenged by an opponent of the development, Alison Alter.

Many of the residents bitterly opposed to the Grove live on the other side of the street, in District 7, which is represented by Council Member Leslie Pool, a critic of project.

“Had staff done as they were directed eight years ago, we wouldn’t be in this spot,” said Pool, who co-founded the Bull Creek Road Coalition, which has opposed the Grove development as it is currently proposed. “The fact was the resolution was not acted on, and here we are today.”

Like Gallo, Pool’s re-election campaign might be defined by the project. Her opponent, Natalie Gauldin, is a prominent supporter of the Grove.

Gallo declined an interview request but provided this statement: “I will continue to support the rights that neighbors and neighborhoods have which are provided under our current state laws and City ordinances.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

You can now call your congressman through Facebook
You can now call your congressman through Facebook

Since the election last November, U.S. lawmakers have seen a deluge of phone calls from Americans weighing in on the GOP's congressional agenda. Now, those floodwaters may rise even higher as Facebook rolls out new tools making it easier for users to contact their representatives. The tools, which were being beta-tested but went live to all Facebook...
More students are looking to head to Canada

Khaled Almilaji has been stranded in Turkey since January. His wife, pregnant with their first child, is waiting at their home in Rhode Island. His classes at Brown University's School of Public Health are well into the second semester. Ever since his student visa was revoked he has been trying to keep up, somehow, from across the ocean. After a federal...
Trump puts a presidential-size spotlight on his brand
Trump puts a presidential-size spotlight on his brand

President Donald Trump’s Saturday started with a trip to the Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Virginia. By Saturday night, on one of the few weekends since the inauguration that Trump remained in Washington, the president was dining at the Trump International Hotel a few blocks from the White House. He was greeted by well-wishers as he entered...
California's clean-air problem is a lot bigger than just Trump
California's clean-air problem is a lot bigger than just Trump

No state is tougher on dirty air than California. How tough? So tough that, if trends hold, it may fall short of its own goals. As President Donald Trump moves to roll back decades worth of regulation, the Golden State has positioned itself as America's bulwark of environmental protection. The reality behind that is complex, and not only because the...
After helping to deport undocumented immigrants, lawyer now fights for them
After helping to deport undocumented immigrants, lawyer now fights for them

In a tiny hearing room at one of the country's most remote and unforgiving immigration courts, Elena Albamonte walked right past the table she had used for years as the government's highest-ranking prosecutor here. Instead, she put her briefcase on the other table, taking a seat next to an Armenian man in prison garb who had illegally crossed into...
More Stories