You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Herman: Zimmerman wants new invocation system for council meetings


In a proposal with little prayer of winning approval before he leaves office, Austin City Council Member Don Zimmerman — burned up about the invitation to a Satanic leader to give the invocation at Thursday’s council meeting — wants to change the way folks are selected to offer the inspirational words that kick off council sessions.

Under the current system, the city staff extends invitations from a list of clergy that includes people to whom the city reached out and of folks who asked to be on the list. Zimmerman says it’s a decision that should be made by elected officials, not “bureaucrats” who he said might act “out of fear” of turning anyone down, including a Satanist.

“That picking and choosing belongs to the people through their elected representatives,” Zimmerman said. “And if we are going to have a Satanist address the City Council, one of the elected council members needs to be responsible for it and invite that person and own up to it.”

Jeremy Galloway had asked to be on the city’s list of clergy. His title is speaker at the Satanic Temple Austin. The city staff invited him to offer the invocation at Thursday’s council meeting. He accepted and was on the agenda but had to back out because he is out of town on business.

Satanic Temple director Devin Desu insists it was no big deal that someone from his group was invited. The Satanic Temple, he said, is just “one of many religious organizations within the Austin community.”

The background on this City Hall flap, as I detailed in Wednesday’s paper, is interesting. It seems to have had its genesis at an April council meeting when Council Member Ann Kitchen sought approval of a resolution declaring Austin a “compassionate community.” Something about that rubbed Zimmerman’s Christianity the wrong way, and he amended it with language taken from the Satanic Temple website. Only he didn’t tell fellow council members it was from that website until after they approved it.

Kitchen’s resolution was approved, with Zimmerman the lone sayer of nay, after his amendment was stripped out. And that was kind of the last we heard of that, until July when the local Satanic Temple chapter was formed.

The group’s website marks that moment with this: “We begin with a simple invocation. Hail Satan! Hail Austin! Hail Don Zimmerman! We are here at last to bring much-needed Satanic insight to our beloved city!”

Hailing aside, Zimmerman’s a lame duck, having lost his Northwest Austin District 6 seat in November to Jimmy Flannigan. Zimmerman’s out in early January. He said that Council Member Ellen Troxclair has agreed to co-sponsor his proposal and keep it alive after he’s gone. Zimmerman would like to get it on a council agenda for first reading this month.

His proposed ordinance says: “Only a person invited by the Mayor, or by a Councilmember, shall be permitted to offer an invocation at a meeting of the City Council. Upon introduction of the person offering the invocation, the name of the inviting Councilmember, or of the Mayor if applicable, shall be stated and then noted in the official minutes of that particular City Council meeting.”

The proposal sets up a meeting-by-meeting rotation, starting with the mayor and followed, in numerical order, by each of the 10 council members by district. And no, you satanic wise guy, District 6 doesn’t get three consecutive selections.

Seems like a reasonable proposal. And I’m sure we all have our suspicions about which council member will be the first to invite somebody from the Satanic Temple.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Travis, Hays see low turnouts in early voting for runoff elections
Carrier factory union chief standing ground against Trump
Atlanta Falcons treat guests to preview of Mercedes Benz Stadium food
Atlanta Falcons treat guests to preview of Mercedes Benz Stadium food
Austin still searching for city manager search firm
Austin still searching for city manager search firm
PolitiFact: Does Austin’s campaign finance system create a loophole?
PolitiFact: Does Austin’s campaign finance system create a loophole?
More Stories