Gov. Greg Abbott’s bone to pick with Austin’s tree ordinance is personal


Among the 20 items Gov. Greg Abbott selected for the month when state lawmakers will return for a special session, one might wonder why a repeal of local tree ordinances made the cut.

The answer might be more personal than expected.

“I live in the Governor’s Mansion now,” Abbott said last week during a radio interview on WBAP 820. “But, before that, I had a house. I wanted to cut down a very common pecan tree in my yard. And the city of Austin told me, ‘No.’ I could not cut it down.

“And I had to pay money to the city of Austin to add more trees to my yard because I wanted to cut down one very common tree that was in a bad location.”

RELATED: Abbott declares, `In Austin, Texas, Austin, Texas, owns your trees.’

Abbott’s tree chagrin apparently dates to 2011, when two large pecan trees stood in an area of the Central Austin property he owned while he was attorney general. He built a new home in 2011 and a pool in 2012, according to city records.

Austin had just passed an ordinance the previous year protecting “heritage trees” — trees of certain species with trunk diameters of at least 24 inches. The measure bars property owners from removing such trees unless the tree poses a safety risk or prevents reasonable land use.

City records indicate officials granted Abbott permits in 2011 and 2012, allowing the construction, as long as the pecan trees’ “critical root zone” was protected.

In May 2012, however, a landscape contractor sought a permit on Abbott’s behalf to remove a pecan tree with a 24-inch diameter trunk, noting the tree was in poor condition and had lost about two-thirds of its canopy.

“Unpermitted impacts have occurred within the critical root zone,” a city arborist wrote.

The city granted the request to tear down the tree, but, as mitigation for the damage, required Abbott to plant new trees with trunk sizes totaling 24 inches.

Austin city officials said the process was standard, but didn’t know why Abbott said he had been told he couldn’t cut down a tree. City records show he was never denied permission to cut down a tree. Abbott’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Other than the sick pecan tree, the city granted requests to remove a heritage elm tree in 2011 and a red oak and a magnolia in 2013 — all without denials or required mitigation. Permits indicate all three trees were in poor condition or dying.

Abbott criticizes tree ordinances

In January 2015, a few weeks before taking office as governor and four months before selling his Central Austin home, Abbott blasted tree ordinances as part of the “patchwork quilt” of local bans hurting the state.

“Texas is being Californianized and you may not even be noticing it,” Abbott told a 2015 conference hosted by the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation, an influential think tank. “It’s being done at the city level with bag bans, fracking bans, tree-cutting bans. We’re forming a patchwork quilt of bans and rules and regulations that is eroding the Texas model.”

Abbott repeated that comparison earlier this month, specifically singling out Austin for “trying to send Texas down the pathway of California.” The next day he called for a special legislative session to address 20 items, including a measure to prevent local governments from regulating what people can do with the trees on their own property.

RELATED: Abbott calls for sweeping special session on conservative goals

State Sen. Donna Campbell, R-New Braunfels, who filed a bill this past session to overturn tree ordinances, last week asked Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to weigh in on whether such ordinances violate the Texas Constitution.

Cities plan to defend tree ordinances

Austin officials note the city’s protection for large trees applies to only about 1 percent of trees in the city. Mature trees, in particular, provide shade that reduces energy costs, and mitigate flooding by stabilizing soil and creating a barrier to water.

“Trees are naturally-occurring infrastructure that save City taxpayers billions of dollars in economic services annually,” Austin’s Intergovernmental Relations Office said in a statement against the proposed 2017 anti-tree-ordinance measures in the Legislature.

RELATED: Local tree ordinances in Republican cross hairs

Roughly 50 Texas cities have tree protection ordinances. West Lake Hills, with its abundantly treed residential areas, has a stringent and oft-enforced tree ordinance to maintain the character of the city, Mayor Linda Anthony has said.

“Our tree protection ordinances are a vital part of what our community said over decades that it wants,” Anthony told the Westlake Picayune in February while in the thick of the legislative session. “Part of Westlake’s identity is its trees.”

West Lake Hills residents must get a permit before removing trees, and in certain circumstances, homeowners are required to replace trees with native species. Anthony has said the city will continue to monitor any legislation that might affect tree protections during the special session.

In Pflugerville, trees 8 inches or more in diameter are protected except for several invasive species. That city’s tree ordinance prohibits removal of protected trees without city review and approval, and it sets guidelines and criteria on replacement trees.

Round Rock updated its tree ordinance in 2005 during a period of rapid growth and a variety of requests pertaining to trees. The ordinance includes rules for removing “monarch trees,” or trees that are 80 percent of the diameter of a species’ largest and healthiest tree within Round Rock.

RELATED: Austin mayor: Abbott’s call for special session is ‘a war against cities’

Round Rock Mayor Craig Morgan said Abbott’s call for a special legislative session is an attack on local control and a political move.

“It’s the most anti-local legislative session I’ve seen in the 14 years I’ve been involved in local politics,” he said. “It’s surprising to me because it’s always been a Republican theme that citizens closest to the people know what’s best in what they need.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

I was detained for protesting Trump. Here's what the Secret Service asked me.
I was detained for protesting Trump. Here's what the Secret Service asked me.

Like many events that end up with a person in handcuffs, my story begins in a bar. I was in Atlanta earlier this month for Netroots Nation, the annual meeting of progressive organizers and writers, when I overheard friends discussing how to resist President Trump's first visit to Trump Tower. I jumped into the conversation: "Well, you call me...
Strange story of 'Blacks for Trump' guy standing behind the president at Phoenix rally
Strange story of 'Blacks for Trump' guy standing behind the president at Phoenix rally

At a number of political rallies over the past two years, a character calling himself "Michael the Black Man" has appeared in the crowd directly behind Donald Trump, impossible to miss and possibly planted. He holds signs that scream "BLACKS FOR TRUMP" and wears a T-shirt proclaiming with equal conviction that "TRUMP & Republicans...
Trump leans on Afghanistan tactics that failed under Bush, Obama
Trump leans on Afghanistan tactics that failed under Bush, Obama

President Donald Trump's new Afghanistan strategy — more troops, pressure on Pakistan and diplomatic outreach to the Taliban — relies on tactics his predecessors tried without success to get out of America's longest-running war. There's little reason to think Trump's approach will produce better results. But with Afghanistan's government...
Naval collision adds to fears about US decline in Asia
Naval collision adds to fears about US decline in Asia

For decades, the U.S. Navy has served as the foremost symbol of America’s power in the Asia-Pacific. With bases from South Korea to Japan to Guam and a fleet of warships bristling with modern weaponry, it has been a physical reminder of the nation’s strength and vigilance in the region to friends and foes alike. Few images could have been...
Tech goes from White House to doghouse in Trump's Washington
Tech goes from White House to doghouse in Trump's Washington

Google once had Barack Obama's ear, served as a revolving door for White House staff and saw its political agenda advance. In Donald Trump's Washington, some conservatives say it's gotten so powerful it should be regulated like a public utility. Google is not alone in a fall from grace. Tech companies — including Facebook Inc. and Amazon.com...
More Stories