Divided Austin City Council grants $7 million favor to state


Highlights

State needs city’s assistance in project to convert part of North Congress Ave. into a pedestrian mall.

Amid tensions between Austin and state officials, request for city’s support faced skepticism from some.

After a closed-door discussion Thursday, Austin City Council members agreed to waive $6.9 million in fees and provide other assistance to the state for a new Capitol Complex — a topic that had drawn wry skepticism during a council workshop earlier in the week.

The Capitol Complex is a planned $581 million three-phase project to convert North Congress Avenue between the Capitol and the University of Texas into a grassy pedestrian mall. The later phases will create new office buildings for state workers at 16th and 18th streets. Work is expected to begin this summer.

The 6-2 vote Thursday, with two abstentions and one council member absent, authorizes city staffers to draft an interlocal agreement with the state to waive fees for the first phase of the Capitol Complex project. It would also provide expedited permitting for the project, appointment of a city staff project team and an agreement that the city will vacate four blocks of North Congress Avenue and convert 16th, 17th and 18th streets to two-way traffic.

The state’s request for monetary and staffing assistance comes at a time when city officials are paused between two legislative sessions seeking to overturn city policies and enmeshed in two lawsuits with the state over immigration enforcement policies. During the discussion at their Tuesday work session, City Council members had salty responses to the state asking for such a large favor at such a strained time.

Council Member Delia Garza questioned whether the Capitol Complex plan would help “pump the smell of freedom into the air,” an aroma that Gov. Greg Abbott said earlier this month doesn’t exist in Austin.

RELATED: Gov. Abbott: Austin stinks and so does ‘Sanctuary Sally’

Council Member Leslie Pool objected to the state asking for money from Austin at the same time it was seeking to reduce the amount of money the city could bring in through taxes. She also raised concerns about two large heritage trees that the plan calls to remove. Trees have been another point of contention between the city and state, as Abbott is seeking to overturn cities’ rules protecting heritage trees.

Mayor Steve Adler responded during Tuesday’s workshop that city leaders should evaluate the state’s request in a neutral manner, without taking into account the ongoing tension. And advocates of the project, including state Sen. Kirk Watson, D-Austin, said the Capitol Complex would provide a great value to the city as a civic space for concerts and festivals.

The council discussed the issue during executive session Thursday.

Garza and Pool abstained from the vote to approve the agreement. Council Members Ora Houston and Ann Kitchen opposed it, with Kitchen saying she thought the agreement was rushed and the public should have a chance to weigh in on it. Council Member Ellen Troxclair was absent.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

What John McCain learned from Ted Kennedy on challenging his own party
What John McCain learned from Ted Kennedy on challenging his own party

WASHINGTON — Ted Kennedy liked to tell a favorite story about Sen. John McCain. The Massachusetts Democrat and the Arizona Republican were on the floor of the Senate and became distracted by a heated debate between two freshmen senators. Just for the fun of it, Kennedy and McCain launched into the fray. As one spoke, the other circled...
This California girl’s neighbor threatened her when she opened a lemonade stand without a permit
This California girl’s neighbor threatened her when she opened a lemonade stand without a permit

Texans love to imagine California as The Land of Overregulation, while the Lone Star State is envisioned as a Place Where Business Thrives, Unencumbered By Government Interference. Now, we know that is not entirely the case (although the Austin City Council did vote to approve a June 2017 resolution that waived the permitting process for lemonade...
Why is Trump surprised Jeff Sessions recused himself from Russia investigation?
Why is Trump surprised Jeff Sessions recused himself from Russia investigation?

Four months after the fact, President Donald Trump is still frustrated that his political ally and attorney general, Jeff Sessions, recused himself from overseeing the Russia investigation that is haunting the president.   "Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before...
Trump has now attacked basically everyone who is in charge of the Russia investigation
Trump has now attacked basically everyone who is in charge of the Russia investigation

President Donald Trump has declared the Russia investigation to be a "witch hunt" and a "hoax," but he sure seems to be concerned about all the people who are leading it.   Trump in an interview with the New York Times on Wednesday made crystal-clear his previously reported distaste for Attorney General Jeff Sessions'...
6 months of President Trump, in 7 issues
6 months of President Trump, in 7 issues

On Thursday, President Trump will have been in office for 181 days, a.k.a. 4,344 hours, a.k.a. 260,640 minutes, a.k.a. six months.   My first reaction is: "Only six months?" Perhaps it's because so much has happened in those six months. And perhaps it feels like time has slowed down because, paradoxically, Trump has not overseen...
More Stories