County to review plan to make up for ‘sanctuary’-related grant cuts


Highlights

Plan would mean specialty courts, victim services and juvenile justice programs wouldn’t be cut.

Recommendation is for the program costs to be covered by existing departmental budgets, at least for a while.

Months after Gov. Greg Abbott cut $1.5 million in state grant funding to Travis County in retaliation for the new sheriff’s jail policy related to immigration, the county’s staff has put together a proposal for making up for the shortfall — at least temporarily.

The Commissioner’s Court will discuss and vote on a proposal by the planning and budgeting office at Tuesday’s regular meeting.

None of the criminal justice programs covered by state grants — which include specialty courts, victim services and juvenile justice programs and serve more than 3,400 residents — would be cut under the proposal.

Instead, the staff is recommending that the program costs be covered by existing departmental budgets before a long-term solution can be found during the fiscal 2018 budget planning process. Six vacant positions across departments also will be removed.

“The departments felt all these programs were such a high priority that they’re making it work within their existing budgets,” Budget Director Travis Gatlin said. “We know there’s a possibility of further reductions down the road from the state, (and) we were aware of that in trying to craft some budgets that would limit the impact to Travis County taxpayers but also continue the programs.”

In a statement released Monday, Travis County Judge Sarah Eckhardt emphasized that the plan coming to commissioners on Tuesday will ensure the continuation of court services for thousands of Travis County residents.

“We still believe that Gov. Abbott’s attempt at political retribution is unfair and unwarranted, but we look at this experience as a positive,” Eckhardt said in the statement. “By taking a good hard look and finding efficiencies in our processes, we will even further improve the great work being done in our criminal court, victim services and juvenile justice systems.”

The estimated cost to continue the programs previously funded by the governor’s office from January, when the cuts took effect, to the end of September is about $800,000, according to a memo filed by Gatlin’s office.

The staff hasn’t yet determined where it will find money for program costs from October through Nov. 15 — estimated to be $133,000.

RELATED: Veterans Court becomes casualty in political war over immigration

After learning of the governor’s cuts, the Commissioners Court in February directed the planning and budget office to review program results and discuss priorities with the seven affected offices and departments, look for ways to use resources more efficiently and explore options for alternative funding.

The commissioners also approved continued funding of more than a dozen program employees until May 15. (Under the proposal, these positions would continue to be paid for using other county sources, some permanent and some that will have to be reassessed in September.)

That same month, offices and departments submitted renewal applications to the governor but, not unexpectedly, were deemed ineligible.

By reorganizing and finding places where efforts were repeated, Gatlin said his office cut the annual cost of the programs from about $1.5 million to about $1.1 million.

Program directors tell him they “don’t think there is going to be a significant impact to the people that they serve” as a result of the cost cutting, he said.

For example, the staff found that counselors who provide treatment for the drug diversion court and DWI court perform essentially the same function and will be able to work for both courts, reducing the staffing need.

Rodolfo Perez, director of pretrial services and adult probation, who oversees both courts, said his biggest concern is making sure he can continue to provide the same level of services. Perez said he is trying to take an optimistic view on an unfortunate situation.

“It may sound corny, but when we go through these types of things, I like to say these are opportunities to reassess what our resources are and maybe even streamline,” Perez said. “We’re going to do the best that we can every day with what we have.”

Update: This article was updated Monday to include comments from Travis County Judge Sarah Eckhardt.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it
Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it

Six years ago, a police officer in this city in eastern Washington was convicted of beating a disabled man to death and trying to cover it up. After other alarming episodes involving Spokane officers came to light, the city asked federal officials to suggest changes to the Police Department as part of an Obama-era policing program.  Ever since...
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first

Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve chairwoman, made a relaxed appearance at New York University on Tuesday night, answering questions about her life in economics and her time at the Fed one day after she announced plans to leave the central bank next year.  Yellen said nothing new about the Fed’s policy plans for the coming months, leaving...
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military

A second federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s proposed ban on transgender troops Tuesday, saying President Donald Trump’s announcement of the ban in a series of tweets this summer was “capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified.”  In a preliminary injunction, Judge Marvin J. Garbis of the U.S. District Court for...
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality

For you and me, the Federal Communications Commission’s plan to repeal net neutrality rules can be boiled down to two questions: What might happen? And whom do you trust?  Here’s our guide for internet users looking for answers.    The net neutrality rules were passed in 2015 during the Obama administration when Democrats...
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.

It began with a familiar pledge: President Donald Trump’s audience, he promised, was going to be very proud of him.  “Hi, Drumstick,” Trump called out Tuesday, preparing to exercise his least controversial executive authority. “Oh, Drumstick, I think, is going to be very happy.”  It ended with characteristic...
More Stories