You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

City Hall girds for fight as it rolls out land code overhaul


Highlights

Mayor says city’s land code is critical to combating Austin’s housing shortage.

First votes expected by December, with hopes for final passage of code redo by early next year.

CodeNext rollout concludes three-year, controversy-riven rewrite of city’s land use rules.

First public input forum scheduled for Wednesday at the Palmer Events Center.

Mayor Steve Adler rolled out the first draft of a sure-to-be-controversial overhaul of the city’s land use rules Monday morning, signaling the start of a yearlong process that will navigate the deep divisions that course through Austin’s politics of development, density and gentrification.

City officials aim to use the 1,100-plus-page draft to replace the city’s current zoning regulations, which date back to 1984 and have been amended more than 800 times over the intervening years.

“We want to grow in a way where we’re managing the growth, rather than having the growth manage us,” Adler said at the Monday rollout at City Hall. Adler was joined by interim City Manager Elaine Hart and several members of the City Council. “There will be voices, probably beginning today, that will talk about all the challenges and none of the rewards.”

He added, “It wouldn’t surprise me if we had people at the end of today criticizing this draft for the color of the cover and the number of pages, but we have to stay focused as a larger community.”

Business groups, developers and neighborhood activists spent the day Monday working their way through the mammoth document, which had been closely held by city planners and consultants until its release.

The draft’s release concludes a three-year, controversy-riven rewrite that is more than a year late and at least $2 million over its original budget, which officials have pinned to the project’s growing scope. It promises to touch nearly all aspects of the city’s growth and development, from building types to transportation requirements.

The current code has few fans, even among usual combatants. Developers have claimed its complexity serves as a massive brake on building badly needed housing across the city; neighborhood groups complain it’s so full of holes that it allows developers to build projects they argue shouldn’t be allowed.

Its replacement, dubbed CodeNext, is a key component of Adler’s strategy to boost the city’s housing supply as Austin battles the wave of gentrification sweeping across its working class neighborhoods, particularly on the east side.

At his State of the City speech Saturday, Adler said the rewrite is a key component of speeding the city’s development process, so it can build the 135,000 apartments and homes it will need over the next decade to house Austin’s booming population.

Both Adler and Hart emphasized that the document released Monday is simply a first draft that will continue to be shaped by public feedback. The public rollout will take place Wednesday at the Palmer Events Center. The first votes, Adler said, are expected to happen by December, with the goal of adopting a rewritten code by early next year.

However, the start of the debate over the code will lack key context until April, when the city is expected to provide maps that will show how the new regulations will affect neighborhoods.

Adler tried to allay concerns about this on Monday, saying that the maps will show the new code will leave much of the city alone.

“In vast parts of this city, nothing will change,” he said. “But in some parts of the city, we really have an opportunity to protect our neighborhoods and the quality of life we have in this city and, at the same time, to be able to ensure we have the housing supply in this city so that housing prices aren’t continually going through the roof.”

Activists with the politically powerful Austin Neighborhoods Council were working their way through the code Monday afternoon but said the lack of maps made it hard to determine the actual effects of the changes.

“Until you see the maps and how it’s applied, how do you know?” asked Mary Ingle, the Neighborhoods Council’s past president.

Ingle also criticized the public draft for lacking any table or other documentation that would easily allow people to see how policies and other requirements changed from the old code to this CodeNext draft.

“It’s crazy,” she said. “It’s not rocket science.”

The Austin Chamber of Commerce said Monday afternoon that it was still reading through the code as well, looking for clues about how it might speed the city’s development process.

The mapping process is key for the chamber, too.

“The devil’s in the details; the mapping process is really going to be where the rubber meets the road,” said Andy Cantú, a planning expert with the group .

Some affordable housing advocates were disappointed with the rewrite on first glance, though they were still working through it as well.

“It looks like there’s a lot of carry-over from the current code,” said Greg Anderson, the director of operations for Austin Habitat for Humanity, who once served as a top aide to former Council Member Sheryl Cole.

“It’s a start; I’m still optimistic,” he added. “What we have right now is so terrible, it doesn’t seem possible to end up with something worse.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Watch for a fight as Austin reviews who’s paying too much for water
Watch for a fight as Austin reviews who’s paying too much for water

Commercial businesses in Austin are overpaying for their water by nearly $4.4 million this year, while homes and apartments are underpaying to the tune of $2.1 million, according to preliminary numbers in an Austin Water cost of service review. Those customers are paying what they’re being charged. But the rates don’t align with what it...
Austin rally calls for stronger action on climate change
Austin rally calls for stronger action on climate change

As tens of thousands of demonstrators marched in Washington, D.C., Seattle, Boston, San Francisco and other U.S. cities to demand action on climate change, a smaller but just as fervent group of protesters gathered at a sister rally on the steps of the Texas Capitol. Organizers of the Austin event — which drew at least 2,000 people, according...
Taylor council candidates agree city needs to attract businesses. jobs
Taylor council candidates agree city needs to attract businesses. jobs

A real estate company owner and a concrete business’ vice president are running against each other for a place on the Taylor City Council. Gary Gola and Dwayne Ariola are competing for an at-large position left vacant by Taylor Mayor Jesse Ancira Jr., who has decided not to seek re-election. The five council members will choose the next mayor...
Lawmakers wary of Russia's ability to plant dirt, fake evidence on their computers
Lawmakers wary of Russia's ability to plant dirt, fake evidence on their computers

In a brief and largely overlooked exchange between Sen. Marco Rubio and America's top spy during a January hearing about Russia's alleged election meddling, the Florida Republican sketched out what he fears could be the next front in the hidden wars of cyberspace.  Could Russian hackers, Rubio asked then-Director of National Intelligence James...
Can Democrats force Republicans' hands on Trump's tax returns? 
Can Democrats force Republicans' hands on Trump's tax returns? 

House Democrats want to force Republicans' hands on President Donald Trump's tax returns — but it remains to be seen how effective posturing can be for the minority.  House Democrats plan to have Massachusetts Rep. Katherine M. Clark introduce legislation requiring Trump to release his tax returns from 2007 to 2016, according to The Washington...
More Stories