Austin sues state in latest round of housing voucher debate


Highlights

City sues over a 2015 state law that bars cities from requiring landlords to accept federal housing vouchers.

The state law quashed a 2014 Austin ordinance prohibiting discrimination based on applicants’ “source of income.”

City officials, mindful of Austin’s status as one of the most economically segregated major metro areas in the country, have been trying for years to shift one factor that determines where poor people live. And now they want to press the issue in court.

Austin this week sued the state of Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott over a 2015 law that prevents cities from requiring landlords to accept federal housing vouchers, a method of payment used by thousands of low-income households in Austin.

That state law quashed a 2014 Austin ordinance prohibiting discrimination based on applicants’ “source of income,” or the way they plan to pay their rent.

The practical impact of the state law, city officials argue, is that poorer residents are turned away from rentals in more affluent areas that could offer better opportunities.

READ THE COMPLAINT: Austin sues state, Gov. Greg Abbott

“Without the ability to protect people from this type of discrimination, the Legislature is basically locking in racial segregation in our city,” said John Henneberger, co-director of the Texas Low Income Housing Information Service. He said his organization “wholeheartedly applauds the city’s actions” in filing this lawsuit.

A 2012 report from the nonprofit Austin Tenants’ Council showed the majority of Travis County landlords didn’t accept the housing vouchers. The units that accept vouchers are concentrated in Northeast, East and Southeast Austin, the report found.

Austin attorneys write that the denial of housing to voucher holders in “higher opportunity neighborhoods,” with better schools and lower crime rates, leads to segregation.

“The segregation of (housing choice voucher) holders to lower opportunity neighborhoods disproportionately impacts African-American and Hispanic residents, children, and disabled individuals,” the complaint states.

The city’s suit, filed Tuesday in federal District Court, says the law violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution by infringing on Congress’ goal of fair housing choice for low-income people.

RENTS ON THE RISE: Looking for a two-bedroom apartment here? You need to make $23 an hour

Paul Cauduro, the Austin Apartment Association’s director of government relations, said its members don’t discriminate against tenants based on source of income but “simply make a business decision not to participate” in the voucher program.

Cauduro said the reluctance stems from complications and inefficiencies in the program.

“Our association is pressing for more changes at the federal level that will make the (program) more efficient and effective,” he said, “and we will continue working with local area governments to keep the housing industry free from unnecessary taxes, regulations and fees impacting rent.”

The Austin Apartment Association, representing rental property owners and operators, sued the city in 2014 over its housing ordinance, saying it forced landlords to participate in the Section 8 housing voucher program.

U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks ruled in favor of the city in 2015, but a few days later, the association appealed. The issue became moot in June 2015 when state lawmakers passed Senate Bill 267 prohibiting such ordinances. The association dropped the suit.

ALSO READ: Should Austin offer incentives for landlords accepting vouchers?

State Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, who authored the law that Austin challenged in court this week, said he was disappointed by the city’s decision to sue.

“Their energy would be better spent incentivizing even more rental properties to participate in affordable housing programs,” Perry said. “The city should not be in the business of forcing private businesses to participate in a heavily regulated federal program that was meant to be voluntary.”

Regardless of landlords’ reasons, however, the effects of not honoring housing vouchers is a form of housing discrimination, Henneberger said. He added that, under the city’s ordinance, landlords could still screen applicants for other criteria such as credit history, landlord references or criminal background.

In urging the City Council last month to vote for filing the lawsuit, Council Member Greg Casar pointed to the city’s strategic housing blueprint, which states that the “lack of affordable housing citywide exacerbates segregation created through historical policies and practices.”

“Our working families and seniors should have the option and the freedom to live in neighborhoods with great schools, public transportation options, and access to healthy food,” Casar said in a statement. “No neighborhood should be walled off entirely by unaffordability.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it
Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it

Six years ago, a police officer in this city in eastern Washington was convicted of beating a disabled man to death and trying to cover it up. After other alarming episodes involving Spokane officers came to light, the city asked federal officials to suggest changes to the Police Department as part of an Obama-era policing program.  Ever since...
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first

Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve chairwoman, made a relaxed appearance at New York University on Tuesday night, answering questions about her life in economics and her time at the Fed one day after she announced plans to leave the central bank next year.  Yellen said nothing new about the Fed’s policy plans for the coming months, leaving...
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military

A second federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s proposed ban on transgender troops Tuesday, saying President Donald Trump’s announcement of the ban in a series of tweets this summer was “capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified.”  In a preliminary injunction, Judge Marvin J. Garbis of the U.S. District Court for...
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality

For you and me, the Federal Communications Commission’s plan to repeal net neutrality rules can be boiled down to two questions: What might happen? And whom do you trust?  Here’s our guide for internet users looking for answers.    The net neutrality rules were passed in 2015 during the Obama administration when Democrats...
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.

It began with a familiar pledge: President Donald Trump’s audience, he promised, was going to be very proud of him.  “Hi, Drumstick,” Trump called out Tuesday, preparing to exercise his least controversial executive authority. “Oh, Drumstick, I think, is going to be very happy.”  It ended with characteristic...
More Stories