Austin City Council divided on affordability action plan


Highlights

The plan has support from five council members and various local organizations.

Critics believe it is overly broad and would make it more difficult to fund social programs.

An affordability action plan championed by Austin City Council Member Ellen Troxclair and four of her colleagues, including the mayor, landed with a thud before the other half of the City Council on Tuesday.

“This is filled with things we are either already doing, can’t be done, or shouldn’t be done,” Council Member Delia Garza said.

The action plan originated with a push from the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce and a coalition of business and nonprofit organizations, and pulled in elements from drafts of other city planning initiatives. It creates an affordability manifesto that includes recommendations to aggressively build more housing, consider a budget option keeping property taxes flat and approve an already-started reform of the city’s permitting process, economic development policy and land development code.

Council members are set to vote on it Thursday.

RELATED: Austin chamber, other groups make new push for ‘affordability agenda’

Tuesday’s initial discussion made it clear that getting the plan through the council will be tight. Troxclair, Mayor Steve Adler and Council Members Ora Houston, Jimmy Flannigan and Ann Kitchen are all co-sponsors of the item. Five other council members — Garza, Leslie Pool, Kathie Tovo, Greg Casar and Sabino “Pio” Renteria — all voiced opposition.

That leaves Council Member Alison Alter, who remained uncommitted, a possible swing vote.

Troxclair said the document is not meant to set requirements in stone, but to create a road map, bring disparate parties together on a plan and recognize work already done.

“If you ask the person behind you in line at the grocery store if the council has addressed affordability, the answer is ‘no,’” Troxclair said. “I want to be able to say, ‘Yes, check, check, check: Here is what we’ve done.’”

INTERACTIVE: How does your budget compare to the average Austinite’s?

Perhaps the proposal’s most controversial element directs the city’s staff to create an effective tax rate budget option — in other words, a budget that wouldn’t increase property tax bills.

Troxclair acknowledged off the bat that she knew her council colleagues wouldn’t support passing such a budget. But she said seeing it would allow them to view their choices more clearly and have better discussions about priorities.

Garza strongly opposed presenting that option, saying that, because of cost drivers in the city, keeping taxes flat would mean making cuts in spending. It would be harder to justify adding costs to a tax-neutral budget, she said.

“If we have to start adding there, that puts us in a much harder — let’s be honest — political position,” she said.

Flannigan disagreed.

“There are certainly people who believe having an effective tax rate budget is the key to affordability,” he said. “But having never seen one, they don’t know the hard choices.”

But several council members said they feared the affordability stipulations would affect funding for health and social programs. Other criticisms of the plan included concerns that it’s overly broad. Pool argued that setting metrics on housing numbers would push the council to rush decisions. Casar suggested that each component of the action plan should be considered separately.

RELATED: Austin City Council approves $22.3 million boost for social services

A couple of opponents suggested the plan was an attempt by its supporters to take credit for efforts already near completion.

“I’m a little bit old school in that, if one of my colleagues has been working on a project, I’d like them to have the opportunity to continue it and receive credit,” Pool said.

Others lodged objections to how closely the plan mirrored the proposal submitted by the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce. Flannigan, a former president of the Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, jumped in to defend the Greater Austin Chamber’s role.

“It’s not the kind of evil place that evil ideas come from,” he said.

Troxclair urged her colleagues who were critical of the proposal to suggest any edits that would allow them to support it by Thursday. She said after Tuesday’s meeting that she and her staff were drafting amendments that would, among other things, make it clearer which projects are already underway.

“Of course, the people who are like ‘I don’t like this because the Chamber is supporting it,’ there’s nothing I can do,” she said.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

PolitiFact: Cruz can’t make us forget the shutdown he caused
PolitiFact: Cruz can’t make us forget the shutdown he caused

With an end to the federal government shutdown, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, tried to argue that, contrary to popular belief, he was not the driving force behind the previous government shutdown in 2013. Back in 2013, Cruz — then a junior member of the Senate’s minority party — had tried to end funding for the Affordable Care Act. He pushed...
Defense Secretary Mattis seeks ties with once brutal Indonesia special forces unit, with an eye on China
Defense Secretary Mattis seeks ties with once brutal Indonesia special forces unit, with an eye on China

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis is pushing to reestablish contact with Indonesia's premier counterterror force, he said Tuesday, decades after it was barred from working closely with U.S. forces due to human rights abuses.  Mattis told reporters a major component of discussion with Indonesian Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu is broadening education...
Watchdog group files complaint against Trump campaign over reported payout to Stormy Daniels
Watchdog group files complaint against Trump campaign over reported payout to Stormy Daniels

The confidentiality settlement reportedly paid to an adult-film star who said she had an affair with Donald Trump years before he became president may have violated campaign finance laws, a watchdog group alleged Monday.  In a pair of federal complaints, Common Cause, a nonprofit government watchdog group, argued that the settlement amounted to...
Analysis: Trump tariffs will save some solar jobs and destroy others
Analysis: Trump tariffs will save some solar jobs and destroy others

The first time the United States tried to protect solar industry manufacturing jobs from foreign competition, things did not go exactly as planned.  Chinese solar panel makers evaded U.S. tariffs by relocating to Taiwan, and the Chinese government retaliated with its own duties on U.S. exports of the raw material used in making the panels - leading...
Why the Democrats lost their nerve in the shutdown battle
Why the Democrats lost their nerve in the shutdown battle

From the outset, the government shutdown had been a test of wills. On Monday morning, the Democrats realized they had lost theirs.  At a caucus meeting in a room just off the Senate floor, a group of vulnerable Senate Democrats told their leader, Charles Schumer, N.Y., that the cost of their effort to protect young undocumented immigrants known...
More Stories