Austin braces for unveiling of long-awaited CodeNext rules


When it comes to shaping Austin’s breakneck growth, the city’s development code determines basically everything: What fits where, how tall a building can be, how many apartments will fit, the number of parking spaces a restaurant will need.

And virtually everyone agrees it’s rife with problems.

Neighborhood activists complain that the 3-decade-old, 1,300-page code — amended more than 800 times — is full of loopholes developers use to build projects that shouldn’t be allowed. Builders complain that it’s so convoluted and full of contradictions, neighborhood activists can tie up projects for years, exacerbating Austin’s housing crunch.

Come January, city officials will take the first steps toward replacing it — rolling out the first draft of their top-to-bottom rewrite, known as CodeNext — according to a schedule set by the City Council last month. A yearlong process of hearings, forums, rewriting and tweaking will follow, with the goal of voting on the new code by April or May 2018.

“We have (zoning) districts that don’t work,” Mayor Steve Adler said. “We have layers of regulation that nobody can seem to understand. We have opt-in and opt-out systems that aren’t predictive and are inconsistent. We have affordability issues in this city, and the code is stopping us.”

Replacing it, though, promises to be one of the biggest political fights in recent history. The new code, all agree, will literally shape the city’s future. The question is what the vision is.

“We have a common vision, I think, of where the city needs to go to, in big measure,” Adler said, pointing to the city’s 2012 planning manifesto, known as Imagine Austin, which sketches a vision of a denser but still neighborhood-centric city.

However, CodeNext has the potential to roll every development controversy in recent years — over density, sprawl and traffic — into one major battle.

The scope of the project, Adler argues, will help it avoid that fate.

“We’re spending way too much time as a council and as a community arguing about what goes at the southwest corner of two streets,” he said. “But I don’t think the code rewrite process is going to be a thousand of those debates. Those debates become harder when they’re considered as just one-off decisions.”

The effects of this massive rewrite on individual neighborhoods won’t become clear until April 2017, when the city is expected to release new zoning maps that show how the changes will filter down.

“Most people are fearful, and they have good reason to be,” said Mary Ingle, the former president of the politically powerful Austin Neighborhoods Council.

Her concerns about the coming changes run the gamut from flood prevention to preserving the character of existing Central Austin neighborhoods, many of which sit near major transportation corridors where city officials have long sought to promote denser housing and commercial development. Central Austin neighborhood activists worry about how CodeNext would fit these projects into their existing neighborhoods.

“That’s where the rubber hits the road,” Ingle said. “If (city officials) want to have increased density, fine. But they need to keep it in scale and things that are compatible with the adjacent neighborhoods.” She warned that if those standards are relaxed, dense developments could “wipe out us.”

In an attempt to allay those concerns, Adler sent a letter to the Neighborhoods Council in October, promising that neighborhoods would have a significant say in nearby developments that would bring denser housing and commercial development.

City officials will have to overcome not just skepticism from the Central Austin neighborhoods about CodeNext, but months of turmoil and secrecy-fueled suspicion about the rewrite.

The project is more than a year late and is expected to cost more than double its original budget. The price tag is now estimated at $4.6 million, up from $2 million, which officials attributed to the growing scope of the project.

The top planner in charge of CodeNext, Matt Lewis, resigned in June after a city investigation found that he mistreated his staff. His top lieutenant left shortly thereafter to take a job in Colorado. The project is now being led by the planning department head, Greg Guernsey, who was Lewis’ boss.

Meanwhile, members of the citizen advisory group — including committee head Jim Duncan, who once ran the city’s planning department — complained that city officials shrouded the rewrite in secrecy by refusing to allow them to review portions of the proposed code before its release.

City officials defended the move by the CodeNext management team as necessary “to ensure that the public had the proper context for the new code,” city spokeswoman Alina Carnahan said in a statement.

That decision left neighborhood activists and developer allies, who are usually at odds, united in frustration.

“I really didn’t feel like it was productive, and I didn’t really feel like we were able to insert ourselves in a way that would be helpful to the process,” said Melissa Neslund, who chairs the Real Estate Council of Austin’s working group on CodeNext. She resigned from the city’s CodeNext advisory panel in May.

“It ended up being a lot of folks who wanted to make their points and in a lot of cases were politically driven. And frankly, we didn’t have a code to review,” she said.

Neslund, like many others, expects the upcoming fight to be long and difficult.

“These are hard conversations; these are years-long battles,” she said. “These are really ingrained types of discussions.”

This story was updated to correct the name of Melissa Neslund’s group, the Real Estate Council of Austin.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it
Trump cracks down on crime, but not on the police who fight it

Six years ago, a police officer in this city in eastern Washington was convicted of beating a disabled man to death and trying to cover it up. After other alarming episodes involving Spokane officers came to light, the city asked federal officials to suggest changes to the Police Department as part of an Obama-era policing program.  Ever since...
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first
As her last day with the Fed nears, Janet Yellen looks back on her first

Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve chairwoman, made a relaxed appearance at New York University on Tuesday night, answering questions about her life in economics and her time at the Fed one day after she announced plans to leave the central bank next year.  Yellen said nothing new about the Fed’s policy plans for the coming months, leaving...
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military
Second judge blocks Trump’s transgender ban in the military

A second federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s proposed ban on transgender troops Tuesday, saying President Donald Trump’s announcement of the ban in a series of tweets this summer was “capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified.”  In a preliminary injunction, Judge Marvin J. Garbis of the U.S. District Court for...
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality
What you need to know about a repeal of net neutrality

For you and me, the Federal Communications Commission’s plan to repeal net neutrality rules can be boiled down to two questions: What might happen? And whom do you trust?  Here’s our guide for internet users looking for answers.    The net neutrality rules were passed in 2015 during the Obama administration when Democrats...
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.
“Hi Drumstick.” Trump pardons a turkey, and likes it.

It began with a familiar pledge: President Donald Trump’s audience, he promised, was going to be very proud of him.  “Hi, Drumstick,” Trump called out Tuesday, preparing to exercise his least controversial executive authority. “Oh, Drumstick, I think, is going to be very happy.”  It ended with characteristic...
More Stories