Reed’s former lawyers say Fennell statements could have changed trial


Highlights

Reed’s lawyers say they would have presented a different case if they had known of Jimmy Fennell’s statements.

But prosecutor says defense had aggressively pursued Fennell in Rodney Reed’s 1998 trial.

Death row inmate Rodney Reed’s original trial lawyers took to the stand on the third day of a hearing looking into his innocence claims, telling the court they would have presented a different case had they known that victim Stacey Stites’ fiancé had provided inconsistent statements about his whereabouts the night before her murder.

The four-day hearing in Bastrop addresses a CNN interview from last year, in which a Bastrop County sheriff’s investigator, Curtis Davis, told reporters that Jimmy Fennell, Stites’ fiancé, gave him a different account of what happened the night before Stites’ death than he testified to in court. Davis said that Fennell told him he was out drinking after playing baseball and came home late, after Stites went to bed. In court, Fennell said he had been home with Stites most of the evening.

“Why would a guy lie about that? What motive?” Calvin Garvie, who defended Reed in 1998, said on the stand Thursday. “Those are two different statements. On one of the most important days of his life.”

On April 23, 1996, Stites, 19, was found raped and strangled along a rural road in Bastrop County with Reed’s DNA on her body. Reed was convicted of capital murder in 1998 and sentenced to death. For 20 years, he has maintained his innocence. His attorneys point to Fennell as the more likely killer.

Garvie said Thursday the defense had been strapped getting ready for Reed’s original trial, with only six months to prepare and three attorneys to interview 278 state witnesses — a daunting, if not impossible task, he said. “We had a limited time to do everything,” Garvie said. “They probably had a year or more ahead of us.”

He said if they had known about Fennell’s inconsistent statements, they could have talked to more witnesses who might have been drinking with him that night, which could have changed the outcome.

The statements came after explosive testimony Wednesday, when expert forensic pathologist Michael Baden, known for his work in the John F. Kennedy assassination, said that Stites had been dead before midnight on April 22, 1996 — a timeline that would point to a killer other than Reed. In 1998, the medical examiner said Stites had been killed around 3 a.m. April 23 on her way to work. Baden said rigor mortis and “fixed lividity,” or where blood had pooled in the body, showed otherwise. He also said there was no visible sign Stites was raped.

His testimony was put on despite prosecution objections that it was outside the scope of the hearing, which state prosecutor Matthew Ottoway said was meant to answer questions about Fennell’s inconsistent statements at the request of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Visiting Judge Doug Shaver allowed it.

RODNEY REED HEARING, DAY 2: Expert disputes time of death

Lydia Clay-Jackson, a court-appointed lawyer for Reed, said with that new information, she would have pushed harder against Fennell and would have asked a pathologist to look further into Stites’ time of death.

But Ottoway said the defense had aggressively pursued Fennell as the killer, introducing mounds of evidence at trial, including that his home had never been searched, that he had sold his truck after the slaying, that he failed a polygraph test and had invoked his right to an attorney. Ottoway also said Reed’s defense team had presented evidence in later hearings on inconsistencies in the timeline the morning of Stites’ death, including in a writ filed in 2006. He said a new timeline would have had no bearing on a medical examiner’s opinion from an autopsy, which considers only scientific evidence.

“What does Jimmy Fennell getting home later have to do with an autopsy?” Ottoway said.

He said there was other evidence Stites was killed on her way to work, including that she was found dead in her H-E-B uniform. Ottoway also said the defense assumed Davis’ statements to CNN were truthful and that he remembered his conversation with Fennell from 20 years ago correctly.

Fennell, who is serving a 10-year prison sentence for raping a woman in his custody when he was a Georgetown police officer, refused to testify at Reed’s four-day hearing, pleading his Fifth Amendment right not to answer questions. His attorney, Robert Phillips, said Fennell stands by the testimony he gave 20 years ago at trial: that he was home with Stites the evening before she was killed.

“Mr. Fennell and his family remain outraged that he continues to be made a ‘suspect’ in this horrific crime committed by Rodney Reed,” Phillips said in a written statement.

RODNEY REED HEARING, DAY 1: Focus on investigator’s recall of conversation

Reed has said that he and Stites were having an affair, which would explain his sperm in her body. Clay-Jackson said the defense did not present that at the original trial because she knew state prosecutors would introduce Reed’s two prior sexual assault offenses if she did.

The state called its first witnesses late in the day Thursday, among them former Texas Ranger Lynn “Rocky” Wardlow, lead investigator into Stites’ death. The state will continue its case Friday, when the hearing is expected to conclude.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Local

Cedar Park holding public meetings about stormwater drainage proposal
Cedar Park holding public meetings about stormwater drainage proposal

Cedar Park is holding town hall meetings about a proposal to create a stormwater drainage and street repairs program. The proposal would reallocate one-fourth of the revenue from the Economic Development Sales tax to the program, a press release from the city said. If the money was reallocated, the program would receive about $1.57 million annually...
Austin police officer fired 4 months after federal indictment
Austin police officer fired 4 months after federal indictment

An Austin police officer was fired today, four months after a federal grand jury indicted him on a charge of making a false statement to a U.S. agency in the midst of his wife’s Social Security fraud case. Officer Roosevelt Granderson II was fired, not because of the charges, but because he did not attend two separate Internal Affairs...
Police: Georgetown woman lied about income to get free healthcare
Police: Georgetown woman lied about income to get free healthcare

A Georgetown woman was accused of falsely claiming she had no income when she applied for health benefits, an arrest affidavit said. Zona Nelson, 65, was charged with theft by deception, a third-degree felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Officials with the Williamson County and Cities Health District told the sheriff’s office they...
Defendant called 911 after injuring boyfriend, jury hears
Defendant called 911 after injuring boyfriend, jury hears

Attorneys representing both sides in a Travis County murder trial agree Stephen Sylvester died in July 2015 at the hands of his boyfriend after they fought, following a night of drinking in downtown Austin, in the apartment they shared. But prosecutors are calling Sylvester’s boyfriend, Bryan Canchola, a jealous murderer who flipped out...
Travis DA clears officers in 3 shootings, without grand jury review
Travis DA clears officers in 3 shootings, without grand jury review

Travis County District Attorney Margaret Moore said Tuesday that she will not pursue possible charges against officers in three police shootings as part of an overhaul in how she handles such cases. Her decision to use “prosecutorial discretion” and end such investigations marks the first time in years that an Austin police officer&rsquo...
More Stories